Jill Stein Says Hillary Will Start Nuclear War – Demands That She Be Given The Opportunity

The Green Party believes Hillary Clinton will destroy all life on Earth, and demands that she be put in office.

screen-shot-2016-11-26-at-5-19-55-am

Jill Stein: Hillary Clinton’s Declared Syria Policy Could Start A Nuclear War | Video | RealClearPolitics

screen-shot-2016-11-26-at-5-24-17-am

CNN has an alternative explanation. They say scientists have determined the election was hacked, using the same evidence free methodology perfected by NASA/NOAA climate experts.

screen-shot-2016-11-26-at-5-16-02-am

Perhaps they will contract to NASA to adjust the election results. NASA has demonstrated great skill at reversing outcomes.

reykjavik2012-2013

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Jill Stein Says Hillary Will Start Nuclear War – Demands That She Be Given The Opportunity

  1. Leon Brozyna says:

    So Stein has discovered her corrupt vision of capitalism … act as a Clinton surrogate and demand a recount because the actual votes didn’t agree with exit polls in traditionally blue collar Democrat areas (surprise! a blue collar democrat won’t tell a person conducting a poll after voting, that he voted for Trump. What is this world coming to?!) Now Stein cashes in on all those disillusioned voters with the suggestion that maybe Clinton won and she’ll prove it … just give her your money. And who’s ever going to know if Stein manages to pocket a couple million left-over dollars from the effort? These liberals are such frauds.

    • Andy DC says:

      Stein’s candidacy undermined Hillary and may have siphoned off enough liberal votes in these close states to ensure Trump’s victory. Now she is carrying Hillary’s water. None of this makes any sense.

    • If they recount Wisco and Clinton gets it, Trup still wins. Michigan too.

      She needs Wisco, Michigan, and PA. Ha ha ha, soooo putrid.

  2. Ross says:

    All sorts of stuff being is reported on this. The Reddit guys reckon they have proved there is a bot working on delivering the funds to Stein’s recount account. Consistently giving US$160,000/hr. If true, it is not hard to imagine who has the central fund from which is coming ( almost certainly Soros).
    In Stein’s application they are talking about hacking being behind the initial “false” counts –problem is Michigan has only a paper/scan counting system which is not linked to the internet in any way. Also they do an initial count and then follow it with their own certified recount ( results announced the yesterday). Similarly ,apparently Pennsylvania doesn’t have a way that would allow hacking.

  3. RAH says:

    It’s all about keeping the zombies riled up in order to delegitimize Trump as much as possible. What the idiots don’t realize is that Trump breaks the mold and this will have zero effect on what he does or how he does it and in fact will only strengthen the support for Trump. Only Trump can delegitimize or weaken a Trump presidency right now.

  4. RAH says:

    Oh, it’s also about Stein enriching herself I suspect.

  5. Yaakov Haimovich says:

    “The issue is never the issue,the issue is The Revolution”.
    Lets hope the USA is strong enough.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Agreed. See my comment at Chiefio’s.

      We are seeing the result of a hundred years of work in the USA. Is this the End Game?

      • Yaakov Haimovich says:

        Better “Ender’s Game” with us on the side of Ender!

        • Gail Combs says:

          I certainly hope so!

          The Second Amendment is a game changer as is the oath to the Constitution.

          Jill Stein is filing for a recount in Wisconsin (27,257 vote win), Michigan (10,704 vote win) and Pennsylvania ( 70,010 vote win) but saying her push for election recounts is aimed at assessing the integrity of the U.S. voting system, not at undermining Republican Donald Trump’s White House victory….

          Note that Hilary’s wins in several states were MUCH closer than Trumps wins in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Not to mention the computer scientists were challenging the electronic machines in Wisconsin where Trump won by over 27K, a good sized margin. Added to that, the electronic machines were mostly in rural areas already dominated by Republicans. The urban counties, mainly Democrat, were paper ballots.

          Trump beat Clinton in Wisconsin by 27,257 votes
          yet Hillary only “won” Nevada by 26,000 votes
          and New Hampshire by 3,000 votes.

          Trump won Pennsylvania by a larger margin than Hillary’s victory in:

          Delaware
          Maine CD#2 as well as the overall margin for Maine
          Minnesota
          Nevada
          New Hampshire
          New Mexico
          Rhode Island

          So why didn’t JillyGirl include ALL these states in her call for a recount HMMMmmm? Why did she wait until the last minute when filing date for many states is already passed?

  6. Zedekiah Smyth says:

    Jillary Stein, how did anyone hack Michigan’s voting when the whole state uses paper ballots? If those Russians are that advanced you’d better think again about letting HRC start a war with them!

  7. DennisA says:

    If the results were manipulated, the hackers weren’t very good, because Trump still got elected.

  8. TA says:

    What’s in it for Stein? She can’t possibly benefit from this recount in this political go-round. Why would she want to appear to be doing Hillary’s bidding?

    Perhaps she thinks keeping her face before the public will benefit her in her next political race.

    She sure does look like a pawn of the Clinton’s. I don’t see how that’s going to help her image, now, or in the future.

    • RAH says:

      Her contributions were taken with the proviso that recounts may not happen.

    • Ernest Bush says:

      As a favorite uncle once said, “always follow the money.” Obviously, if there is no political gain, then it has to be about the money she is being given.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Skuttlebutt is her campaign owes a lot of money….

      Also remeber Bernie’s new vacation home. Maybe Stein wants a vacation home on a Caribbean island.

    • Aurora Svant says:

      Follow the money. And lookup her tweets where she mentions she can’t guarantee the funds she raised will all go to the recount.

  9. Aurora Svant says:

    Let them recount also in every state where there is suspicion of foul play by having the dead or illegal aliens vote democrat. Then let’s see the real score Hillary Clinton made.
    Should not be far north of 50 rather than the 200-odd she is painstakingly stacking now.

  10. ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N says:

    Tony, unless I’m missing something, I believe your animated chart has the years reversed – 2013 should be the up-adjusted frame:

  11. Ross says:

    It looks like Dr Stein will have a difficult job.
    She will almost certainly not be able to comply with Michigan state law for a recount
    http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?Id=51123

    Also in Pennsylvania there is a huge hurdle to get over

    https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/801972249209270272/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    So that leaves Wisconsin. She can have a play and even if the recount turns it into a Clinton win, it will be a waste of time.

    Clinton’s lawyers have said they couldn’t find any evidence fraud or errors.
    Obama has also said the election result should accepted.

    So Dr Stein is probably going end up with egg on her face.

  12. Gail Combs says:

    As it stands now:
    Trump 306 Electoral Votes
    Hillary 232 Electoral Votes

    Wisconsin = 10 Electoral Votes
    Michigan = 16 Electoral Votes
    Pennsylvania = 20 Electoral Votes
    TOTAL = 46 Electoral Votes

    538 members of the Electoral College
    270 electoral votes needed to win

    So Hillary 232 + 36 (Michigan +Pennsylvania) = 268 Electoral Votes

    That means Hillary needs Michigan plus Pennsylvania and either Wisconsin flipped or Wisconsin removed from the Electoral College.

    PENNSYLVANIA:
    In the PA rules it would take a Judge to order a recount based on some “facts” otherwise, they can’t have one. See the article here:
    http://billypenn.com/2016/11/23/a-pennsylvania-recount-for-hillary-clinton-a-nightmare-scenario-explained/

    WISCONSIN
    Per the WI Recount rules – once the recount is completed, all the other candidates have 5 business days to file a petition against the results. If Trump lost he would do this. However note the timing. They should complete by 12-13. Then add five days which would put it past 12-19 if someone filed a complaint. That means Wisconsin would be removed from the Electoral College completely.

    Wisconsin will begin a presidential recount next week and the state could risk losing its ability to have its 10 electoral votes counted if it doesn’t meet key deadlines next month.

    Hitting a Dec. 13 deadline could be particularly tricky if Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein is able to force the recount to be conducted by hand, Wisconsin’s top election official said.”

    That recount took more than a month. This one would have to happen more quickly because of a federal law that says states must complete presidential recounts within 35 days of the election to ensure their electoral votes are counted. This year, that’s Dec. 13.

    “You may potentially have the state electoral votes at stake if it doesn’t get done by then,” said Haas.

    A lawyer with Stein’s campaign has said it wants the recount done by hand. That would take longer and require a judge’s order, Haas said.

    http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/11/25/recount-would-have-move-quickly/94417686/

    The path going forward for a Hillary win looks rather rocky.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Stein wants a recount in order to determine if there is an irregularity.

      This is contrary to Wisconsin law.

      Wis. Stat. § 9.01(1)(a)2.b

      [Each verified petition under subd. 1. shall state all of the following:] That the petitioner is informed and believes that a mistake or fraud has been committed in a specified ward or municipality in the counting and return of the votes cast for the office or upon the question or that another specified defect, irregularity, or illegality occurred in the conduct of the election.

      http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/9/01/1/a/2/b

      Stein has presented no factual basis for a recount. Essentially it is a nuisance suit and should be tossed.

  13. Ross says:

    Gail
    Your post @ 1.22 am says that Wisconsin will start a recount next week but your 1.38 am post clearly shows that it contrary to state law. So aren’t they just wasting time and money ? Could the recount, no matter what the result be classed as invalid ?

Leave a Reply to Aurora Svant Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.