NOAA US Temperature Nonsense Update

NOAA claims January-October was the second hottest on record in the US, and that the US is getting much hotter.

screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-8-41-16-am screen-shot-2016-11-09-at-8-40-58-am

Their actual thermometer data shows that January-October was sixth warmest after 2012, 1921, 1934, 1938 and 1998. There has been no January-October warming over the last 80-90 years.


Meanwhile, the frequency of very hot days has plummeted in the US, with 2016 being one of the coolest on record.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to NOAA US Temperature Nonsense Update

  1. AndyG55 says:

    In RSS the top 5 “year to October” in the Cont USA are…

    2012 1.169
    2000 0.880
    2016 0.768
    2015 0.742
    1998 0.709

    But that of course doesn’t include the WARM years around the 1930’s which NOAA has undoubtedly “adjusted” out of existence in the fabrication that they put to the public.

    UAH USA, for October, isn’t available yet.

  2. RickS says:

    But again, it is very “easy” to verify “true” Global Temperatures which is “exactly” what the Writer of this Blog does and does correctly !

    But as long as people (US more than others) keep believing what they are being told instead of researching the “facts” themselves and locating the correct “facts” of REALITY then all else means nothing !!

    Same for today’s Election, all the evidence leading to a “corrupt” and “criminal” Hellary Clinton is easy to see and is completely obvious even without researching it, but will the American People “choose” to see it reflecting in their “Vote” ?

    “Truth” doesn’t mean much these days even “when” it’s obvious and Americans consistently stand in lines every 4 years to “Vote” to their own “destruction, and that’s what is happening today ? ! ?

    And since “I” have virtually “No” faith in the American People it “seems” that Hellary will walk away as the Victor today leading to her nomination as the President of the United States which is virtual madness !

    These “are” the “last” days where common sense means nothing anymore and/where something “Non”-Human is gathering strength with little to get in its way !!!!!

    But again, the “stupidly” of the Masses World Wide (ESPECIALLY WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA !!!!!!!) is growing to levels once thought impossible but it’s right there before your eyes…

    So My Faith ?

    [ Gods “will” be done ] !

    Faith in Human Beings is a complete waste of time…

    Truth FightOn

    • Take your thumb off the quote key please

    • Caleb says:

      The so-called “masses” are not as stupid as you imagine. Many are simply working rotten jobs because they want to feed their families. They vote their wallets.

      The rotten jobs used to involve working in a factory. Those jobs have disappeared. Now the rotten jobs involve working for the government. Now those jobs may disappear.

      For the ordinary working stiff, we are entering times that will try men’s souls. The struggle is just beginning.

      If we stand by the Truth then Truth will stand by us. If we can allow the ordinary working stiff to see this Higher Truth, rather than the dog-eat-dog survivalist-reality the Clinton’s were ruled by, it will be a great awakening.

      It won’t be easy. I thank God for the web, and Sites like this one, which have been a refuge, over the past decade, for those who love the Truth.

      The mainstream media got its nose smacked like a bad, bad dog, last night.

  3. Kyle_Fouro says:


    Been following this blog only recently, so excuse me if you’ve gone in depth on the subject I wish to bring up.

    What exactly is your opinion on the validity of the adjustments/homogenizations made to the raw data by organizations like the aforementioned organizations? Clearly you value the raw data more, though I’m still not 100% clear as to why you value it over the final product.

    Anyone may feel free to answer. A link with an outside source discussing and criticizing the adjustments in depth would be appreciated.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey Kyle! “Clearly you value the raw data more, though I’m still not 100% clear as to why you value it over the final product.”

      Speaking for myself, there are two main reasons why I value the raw data over the adjusted data. The adjustments have never been fully documented. Yes, there are legitimate reasons for adjusting data. For example, sites may have experienced verifiable instrument changes that affect readings, TOB may have changed, etc. Taken in a strictly abstract sense, yes, adjustments are not intrinsically wrong. However, any adjustments have to be explained, not only for WHY they were done, but also by how much they were done, and what formula is used to calculate the adjustments. Additionally, the adjustment procedure needs to be documented enough to show that the adjustments were not arbitrarily chosen to fit some pattern. (For example, suppose that there are six justifiable reasons to adjust data, where half of them increase the reading and half decrease the reading; only doing those that increase the reading is wrong. Likewise, suppose that some adjustment tends to decrease the reading; doing that adjustment for the oldest data, but not for the newer data is wrong.)

      The temperature adjustments have never been justified in a way that allows another party to duplicate them. “Unverified adjustment” is just another way of saying “faked data”. (And yes, sceptics have pleaded with the various scientists and agencies for years and years to show their work, but without success.)

  4. wizzum says:

    Looks like they were actually predicting the election result instead of the temp.

  5. Eliza says:

    let us be gracious in victory Do not persecute AGW’s LOL

  6. Eliza says:

    Tonight is the end of the AGW scam worldwide at last.

  7. Tony, see if you can get a job on President Trump’s cabinet and turn these fake temperatures back again.

  8. Analitik says:

    The latest map I’ve seen of the USA shows a lot of states colored red :)

  9. OrganicFool says:

    Trump has won (unofficially at this time)

    • OrganicFool says:

      6 more points

    • RAH says:

      Let us hope, nay pray, that the Donald’s actions match his rhetoric. As I ponder why this has happened and all the things he has said that he will try to do it struck me that there was not a single major issue that Trump took that I disagreed with his position. We Hoosiers did our part. Trump won by an overwhelming margin here. Evan Bayh has lost and so has the worthless POS Gregg.

      As I watch the electoral map it seems the liberals that compose it are holding out and not calling states for Trump as quickly as they should. They certainly blew it on their polls as many of us suspected they would.

      I just got in from a load. Tried to keep up with the election as much as possible. Now I’m home having a celebratory Jack Danials and Coke. I raise my glass to all you fellow “Deplorables” and to all that took the time and trouble to vote for what very well have been our last opportunity to save this Republic.

      • Dave1billion says:

        I just offered a toast to you RAH. “May you be in heaven an hour before the Devil knows you’re dead”.

        I’ll offer any appropriate apologies tomorrow.

  10. AndyG55 says:

    I’m going to see Tony and Tim talk at Five Dock tomorrow.

    Should I take a big towel to wipe the grins off their faces ? :-)

  11. Andy DC says:

    Let the swamp draining begin! NOAA and NASA are the perfect place to start. Tony, I hope you get a chance to work on the transition and perhaps in the Trump administration.

  12. charles nelson says:

    That looks like a map of Trump supporters!!!

  13. Dan Paulson says:

    Tony, whether you work for or advise the new administration, I hope you push for something I call “The Climate Data Integrity Act”. You already know what that should include.

  14. Steve Case says:

                               I look forward to the construction of the last windmill.

Leave a Reply to AndyG55 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *