Hottest Year Ever Update

Gavin’s fake hottest year ever to end with record cold and heavy rain in Tennessee. There must have been a massive drop in CO2, causing the atmosphere to quit trapping heat.

Experts tell us that very warm melty Arctic air turns very cold when it moves south.



This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Hottest Year Ever Update

  1. HELP…
    Dear Coach
    Please inform this duhhhinformed how to link your GREAT STUFF to Facebook…

  2. TA says:

    Sure do hate seeing the inevitable cold coming this way. But, that’s the way of the world.

    The really bad part is the cold won’t shut the climate change alarmists up. They just incorporate the cold into their narrative.

    I read a claim the other day where alarmists were saying another 10 or 20 years of a temperature pause would still fit in with the CAGW theory. Hot or Cold, it doesn’t matter to them. The chance to gain money and power will make some people rationalize just about anything, won’t it.

    • gator69 says:

      Not so fast! According to the NOAA State of the Climate 2008 report, climate computer model simulations show that if observations find that the globe has not warmed for periods of 15 years or more, the climate models predicting man-made warming from CO2 will be falsified at a confidence level of 95%:

      “Near-zero and even negative trends are common for intervals of a decade or less in the simulations, due to the model’s internal climate variability. The simulations rule out (at the 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr or more, suggesting that an observed absence of warming of this duration is needed to create a discrepancy with the expected present-day warming rate.”

      (Page 24, Middle column, above)

      According to Phil Jones, there has been no statistically significant warming since 1995 [16 years, 3 months ago]. Ergo, the climate models have already been falsified at the 95% confidence level and it’s time to revert to the null hypothesis that man made CO2 is not causing global warming.

      He further admitted that in the last 15 years there had been no ‘statistically significant’ warming, although he argued this was a blip rather than the long-term trend.

      Crap models are all they have. They have nothing, unless they defend their crap models.

      I watched a recent lecture given by Dr Patrick Frank, who shows that climate models have error bars over one hundred times lager than the signal they are “attempting” to detect. And that error range was just from their failure to model clouds, and does not include any other forcings.

      Scuttled science.

  3. RAH says:

    It’s almost impossible now for 2016 not to be recorded as the hottest year in the 38 year UAH record. But Roy Spencer says:
    “It should be pointed out that 2016 will end up being 0.03-0.04 deg. C warmer than 1998, which is probably not a statistically significant difference given the uncertainties in the satellite dataset adjustments.”

  4. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    If society learns the true nature of the forces that produce climate change it will be because one little-known nuclear geochemist, the late Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda (1917-2001) risked his life to preserve nuclear secrets that frightened world leaders and guilt-ridden scientists hid from the public by uniting nations and national academies of scisnces under the UN on 24 OCT 1945.

    • gator69 says:

      Congratulations Oliver! This is your one millionth serving of…

      • gator69 says:

        Delicious Spam!

      • wert says:

        Right On, Commander!

        I guess Oliver K Maunel has a 104 key keyboard with a custom copy paste key for his Message.

        Not that we wouldn’t like it, it’s a great message. Million copies, it must be megabytes. Can you, Oliver K Maunel, please give a second^H1,000,001th portion?

        Quote of the day. “The ponderous response of the climate system means we don’t need to instantaneously reduce GHG amounts.” – Jim ‘Donau of thoughts’ Hansen

  5. RAH says:

    Certainly is hot up on Mauna Kea this morning. So hot it’s melting the lenses on their cameras.

    Mauna Kea web cam:
    Vis web cam:
    Live Allsky cam:

    Oh! I’m sorry. The lenses aren’t melting. That’s snow from a storm that is dumping 20-30″ on the summit.

  6. Steve Case says:

    Experts tell us that very warm melty Arctic air turns very cold when it moves south.

    You mean like this:

    [A] growing body of evidence suggests that the kind of extreme cold being experienced by much of the United States as we speak is a pattern that we can expect to see with increasing frequency as global warming continues.
                                                                                          Dr. John Holdren January 2014

  7. ClimateYogi says:

    Aloha Gang ! I’ve been a devout ingestor of info from this site and many others on this topic for 3 years now . I often read and enjoy the comments until my eyes bleed ! I feel that I can hold my own and educate my friends on the topic of CAGW . It totally fascinates me !

    I have a question for anybody willing to answer about the topic of aerosol spraying in particular . It’s seems to me that there is much evidence from around the globe as to its existence but seems to be a taboo subject amongst skeptics . The geoengineering watch folks think us skeptics are all nuts and are doing a great disservice to their activism . I can see how weather manipulation could go hand in hand with this constant “Warmist year ever” nonsense . There is obviously money to be made in this “science” in more ways than one .
    I want to use our new administrations website , Great Again dot gov , to make suggestions to rein in the unethical science programs that affect us all . What do you all think about geoengineering to raise temps to skew the data towards more warming ?
    Thanks for your input !
    Yes there is snow on Mauna Kea already and it’s beautiful !

    • AndyG55 says:

      “What do you all think about geoengineering to raise temps to skew the data towards more warming ?”

      Then they won’t be using CO2 will they! :-)

      No geoengineering needed when you have to fabricate nearly 50% of the land surface data and goodness knows how much of the ocean data..

      .. and make whatever changes to past data you think you can get away with.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Geoengineering is a great money scam for academics. They can talk about it and ‘research it’ all year long just don’t expect any real results.

      • ClimateYogi says:

        Gail , please check out the website and check out a video or two . I think it’s being applied as well as researched already . It fits perfectly into the globalist agenda to control everything , and take our money at every opportunity !

        • John Griggs says:

          I used to refer folks to that website. Unfortunately I had to stop sending folks there after realizing that the introduction to every article DW writes is riddled with fear porn. In Danes world, and I’ve asked him this personally when I met him in Redding so I know this, there are no solutions to stopping geoengineering, and the only thing you can do is to keep yourself in a constant state of anger and fear. Consequently, if you send someone to his website thinking that you are helping them to awaken to the realities of geoengineering, you are doing quite the opposite. You will probably set them off by a year or two. You are better off encouraging them to watch “Thrive” or even David Wilcock on GAIA TV. Also Dane goes by what we now know (thanks to this incredible Blog) to be fraudulent data. I doubt that former employees of Neocon organizations like Bechtel could be so easily led by false data as to tell people the world is on the brink of collapse for 10 years running now. So Gail, please don’t check out geoengineering If you are curious as to why there are so many contrails in the sky, since they quit using steam cooling engines in airplanes after World War 2 then you might want to pat yourself on the back for coming here. This is because you now can build the foundation for your case of geoengineering/weather warfare from the ground up. Since you can use this blog to prove these folks are lying through their, (no dental coverage with mandatory Obamacare,) tooth, you can now find a way to prove geoengineering through this very blog. You simply need to show that chemtrails are actually chalk lines for microwaving the atmosphere and altering the weather . Lots of good stuff at
          Good Luck

          • ClimateYogi says:

            John , thank you for your input and the aircrap link . Yes it does seem that Dane is über passionate and zealous about his cause and I would not blame anybody for not buying into it totally . My initial question though has more to do with whether these aerial programs could be skewing temp data to show more warming , on top of adjusted data and UHI effects . I’ll dig into your link further soon . Thank you again !

  8. ClimateYogi says:

    Thanks for responding . Yes , co2 is nothing compared to Aluminum oxide ! If you get a chance , check out the geoengineering dot org website and check out a video or two . It’s pretty clear that these programs are being used globally . The comments section gives an idea of their pervasive use and effects on the people who live under the haze ! Here in Hawaii farmers are claiming that their crops are being affected . We have a volcano here that pumps out sulphurous compounds all day long which certainly isn’t great but the reported toxins in this atmospheric spraying are much worse .
    It’s funny how the geoenginneer activists believe NASA on the climate studies but not on the weather modification experiments . If we could get them not to trust NASA on either then we would have some common ground !

  9. Pingback: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove

  10. Bytor says:

    Yes, unfortunately I am in Tennessee … freezing my arse off !!!

    I was misled into believing that Tennessee was part of the “south”, you know … “warm” .. ugh! … forecast is for snow on Thursday.

    While we experienced an unseasonably warm fall this year, mother nature is paying us back. Rain, cold, snow … ick!!!

    • RAH says:

      Trials by fire and now by ice. Snow does not bother me. It’s ice that is dangerous be it on the roads or when it accumulates on the power lines and trees. And that is what I’m most concerned about now. I have my generator up front in the garage so I can get her out if the need arises, but if I’m not here? My neighbor that would usually have my back is scheduled for surgery on his back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *