Obama’s Last Gasp Attempt To Corrupt The Electoral College

The fake news today about Russia has nothing to do with with Russia. It is Barack Hussein Obama hoping to corrupt the electoral college vote on Monday.


Using CIA, Russia for Democrat Politicking Is Dangerous

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Obama’s Last Gasp Attempt To Corrupt The Electoral College

  1. Robertv says:

    I would change ‘democrats’ for progressives because Trump is also under attack from progressive republicans clinging to power, and destroying the country in the process.

  2. “I’ve explored the deep politicization of intel community” …
    The US is in a real bad way. And it’s very hard for a politician to depoliticise organisations because by their nature they tend to do it in a very political way.

    However, of all the presidents, Trump is the least Party political – indeed, it hardly seems right to call him a “Republican”.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Trump is not a republican. If anything he is a member of the American Patriot Party/ Tea Party.

      What happened is the non-Progressives staged a coup and took over the Republican party. No third party had any chance to ever win in the US two party system so a takeover was our best bet. The Tea Party showed up in response to the Banker bailouts and other unpopular laws in 2009.

      Of course this did not suit the Elite so they tried to kill off the movement. How We Killed the Tea Party

      Report: Chamber of Commerce to Spend $100 Million to Destroy Tea Party

      Salem Media became the ‘voice of the Tea Party’ but they were also part of the effort to take down the renegades. Insider Reveals Salem Media Was Part of The Coordinated Gang-of-Eight Manipulation (Gang-of-Eight was the Republican support for making illegals citizens. This would completely change the character of the USA to a third world socialist loving mentality.)

      So what you had was a large portion of the US voting population fed up with D.C. Rasmussen showed voters split 1/3 Tea Party, 1/3 Democrat and 1/3 Republican in 2010. Once you got a real candidate to lead those renegades as a ‘republican’ you ended up with ~2/3 of the voters. Only voter fraud, and illegals voting gave Hillary anywhere close to the number of votes Trump got.

      We renegades figured we would have to win by AT LEAST 10% (45% Hillary to 55% Trump) to have a chance of overcoming the voter fraud.
      CNN reported that Voter turnout at 20-year low in 2016 which makes ZERO sense since Trump got more votes than any Republican during a primary despite a field of 17. That leads to the possibility of ‘Fraction Magic’ as well as vote flipping which was seen. http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-video/

      President Obama literally came out and TOLD illegals to vote. There would be zero legal enforcement.

      ….Taking the least conservative measure e at least one indicator showed that the respondent voted yields an estimate that between 7.9% and 14.7% percent of non-citizens voted in 2008.

      Since the adult noncitizen population of the United States was roughly 19.4 million (CPS, 2011), the number of non-citizen voters (including both uncertainty based on normally distributed sampling error, and the various combinations of verified and reported voting) could range from just over 38,000 at the very minimum to nearly 2.8 million at the maximum”…


      (Mexico’s former ambassador to the U.S. said that 30 million “undocumented immigrants” are living in the United States.)

      Subtract out that 2 to 3 million and Trump won the popular vote without even looking at the other types of voter fraud.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House of Representatives has a really great presentation about Trump. Newt is a Historian and has a really good sense of humor. He grabs you and keeps you interested. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIe95tyHQs4

  3. RAH says:

    The democrats have nothing right now but the guy in the WH using his short time in power to do what he can with the aid of a Federal bureaucracy and that is what we’re seeing.

    The Russians (and a whole lot of others) attempting to hack is nothing new. The CIA knew it months ago. What they have done though is change their intelligence assessment of it to claim it “effected the election process”. That is why they have refused to brief congress or even the Senate Intelligence Committee on it. If they did it would become evident that the actual information was old but the intelligence assessment of that old information was changed to support the democrat narrative. Heads need to roll and I don’t just mean firings but prosecutions.

    I am so tire of this crap. It has been going on for some time. During the fighting in Bosnia Kosovo the Clinton Administration Ordered the USAF to alter its published bomb damage assessment. SF BDA teams on the ground were confirming that the bombing campaign had been far less effective than was being claimed and the USAF to it’s credit was going to publish the facts as they were revealed by the eyes on the ground. It would look bad for the administration that was making all kinds of claims about the effectiveness of their high altitude bombing campaign. So the report was ordered to be altered. Meanwhile the CIA which always before was much more conservative in their BDA reports than the USAF suddenly got right in line and backed up the USAF doctored report. This is deadly serious stuff.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.