Plummeting August 13 Temperatures In The US

On this date in 1936, the US was incredibly hot. Minneapolis, Kansas was 119 degrees, 32 degrees warmer than their forecast maximum today of 87 degrees. Experts say this is the hottest year ever, and temperature extremes are getting much larger.

The data shows the exact opposite of expert claims. The range of daily temperatures is plummeting – indicating that the climate is becoming much milder.

Government climate experts are criminals – not scientists.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Plummeting August 13 Temperatures In The US

  1. Andy DC says:

    If we started our charts with 1936, the rate of cooling would be astronomical. If the alarmists can start their sea ice charts with the outlier year, 1979, why cant we start ours with 1936? What is good for the goose is good for the gander!

    You are demonstrating that, unlike the alarmists, we don’t have to cherry pick to get the desired result.

    • gator69 says:

      I agree with Potheader. Let’s review the science together John, and ignore the rhetoric. Where should we start? How about with the basics?

      1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.

      2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.

      There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.

  2. James says:

    This article is hilarious, there are so many problems with this article that clearly the author has no idea what climate change is.

    #1 US is not the earth. Picking a the temperature on single day in 1936 in USA is NOT reflective of the WORLD
    #2 Temperature change is NOT climate change.
    #3 Scientists already know there are spikes and troughs, this isn’t news
    #4 Such a tiny sample size from 1936, how about a trend to include how this compares to climate change over the history of the world, which is billions of years. not less than 100 years ago.
    #5 There is only statistical data from 1950 for world climate which is why this period is always referenced. Before 1950 average temperatures are measured using ice cores so there isnt a day by day measure.

    • tonyheller says:

      Where do these complete morons come from? Probably 95% of the global daily temperature records since 1895 come from the US. There are so many things wrong with your brainless comment I could spend a day addressing them. You have no idea what you are talking about and are an ignorant, arrogant ass.

      Go back to your left wing hell hole where no one cares about your lies and stupidity.

    • gator69 says:

      I think James is in desperate need of a safe space right about now. Anyone have crayons or playdoh for our new visitor?

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      James,

      You’ve wasted an excellent opportunity to remain silent.

      You’ve succumbed to the urge to speak out and remove all doubts.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “US is not the earth. Picking a the temperature on single day in 1936 in USA is NOT reflective of the WORLD”

      No, but the whole Northern Hemisphere follows the same pattern

      1940s was WARM.. Get over it.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “Temperature change is NOT climate change.”

      Yep, that is why the AGW scammers had to change the name from “global warming” to ” climate change”

    • AndyG55 says:

      “Scientists already know there are spikes and troughs, this isn’t news”

      Yep , they are to do with NATURAL ocean releases,
      NOTHING to do with CO2

    • AndyG55 says:

      “Such a tiny sample size from 1936, how about a trend to include how this compares to climate change over the history of the world, which is billions of years. not less than 100 years ago.”

      The last 10,000 years have shown a remarked decline in temperatures.

      It should be noted that basic all “climate change garbage, like NH sea ice etc, is based from 1979.

    • AndyG55 says:

      ” Before 1950 average temperatures are measured using ice cores so there isnt a day by day measure”

      You have to be THE MOST IGNORANT AGW CRETIN that ever existed.

      Thermometers were invented well before 1950

      https://www.brannan.co.uk/who-invented-the-thermometer

  3. Kris Johanson says:

    James, take my advice… you have to follow the forum for awhile before unloading, as all these issues and more are dealt with on a rotating basis

  4. Concerned about your inability to interpret data says:

    Which experts are you referring to, and what exactly did they say?

    You paraphrased that they said temperature extremes are getting larger, which they are. You are refuting something that nobody has said, or at least you haven’t identified the claim you are refuting.

    • tonyheller says:

      Total BS

    • Gator69 says:

      You paraphrased that they said temperature extremes are getting larger, which they are. You are refuting something that nobody has said, or at least you haven’t identified the claim you are refuting.

      Sounds like somebody is more than a little confused. The experts are not talking about temperature extremes that are getting larger? In which universe does this make sense?

      • Concerned about your inability to interpret data says:

        The author’s refutation of the as yet non-existent claim that there would be an upward trend in temperature. Author alleges that “experts” claim the temperature extremes would increase, an as yet non-existent claim which happens to be shown in the author’s graphs. There are two clauses separated by a full stop, if you care to go back and read my comment properly.

      • gator69 says:

        I not only read your post, I copied it. And it still makes no sense. If “experts” are not saying that ” extremes are getting larger”, why do you? If nobody said it, why do you assert it to be true?

        Use all the stops you like in your reply.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      I understand you are “concerned” and don’t like what has been shown above but that’s it. It seems that you have sacrificed clarity in your haste to object.

      I only assume that you think you can interpret the data better but it’s hard to tell.

      Can you rephrase your objections clearly and tell us what you want to see about the claims and counterclaims about extremes and temperature trends? What is your interpretation of the temperature record? What do your graphs show?

      • Concerned about your inability to interpret data says:

        I have no emotional reaction to seeing the average temperature in Minneapolis, Kansas decrease.

        I could possibly interpret the data better – however the author would need to identify the source of their data.

        I take umbrage with the author claiming to prove “experts” wrong. The unnamed and unquoted experts are alleged to have said that temperature extremes would increase. The author presents graphs with unsourced data showing the average temperature decreasing, however, the claim they are meant to be refuting is that temperature extremes are increasing. Ironically, August 13, 1936, Minneapolis, Kansas is one such example of the increase in extreme temperature variability. To make a complete analysis, the date range would need to extend back further.

        • gator69 says:

          Why would you be offended? Weird.

        • AndyG55 says:

          “I could possibly interpret the data better ”

          ROFLMAO.

          Of course you could, dearie !!

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          “I have no emotional reaction …”

          That’s a good start. Now, re-read your comments. Something here upset you and you had trouble expressing your thoughts. That can happen to anybody. You were busy when you missed several decades of the global warming discussion. There is no reason why you could not catch up but concentrate when you make further comments. Try to put yourself in the shoes of other people reading them. They do not know what’s swirling in your mind. Use verbs in your sentences.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Concerned about your lack of intelligence !!

    • AndyG55 says:

      “temperature extremes are getting larger”

      REAL , unadjusted data.. said …

      Nope …. Speak to the hand !!!

  5. AndyG55 says:

    CONGRATULTION to Tony Heller. :-)

    You really are dragging the AGW CRETINS out of their inner-city far-left socialist totalitarian SEWERS. !!

  6. Gary says:

    I appreciate the effort to provide the climate change overview of facts based on openly provided data.

    At present I have been suspicious of the Climate Change agenda due to the lack of scientific objectivity and the almost religious cult following surrounding it at present.

    I like to see different opinions based on open discussion of fact, so your work is refreshing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *