Ask And Ye Shall Receive!

“Adult science” below!

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Ask And Ye Shall Receive!

  1. Scott Koontz says:

    No link. No source.

    Why do you continue to post links with graphs that you simply made up? Do people on this site really believe that some random Monckton graph is reality?

    Post a link to how you created these graphs. These would be great examples of how Heartland creates random graphs and then duped the most dupable people in the US.

    • tonyheller says:

      On the contrary. It is all open source and you can reproduce it yourself. You should probably try actually reading the blog sometime.

      https://realclimatescience.com/unhiding-the-decline-for-windows/

      • Scott Koontz says:

        “That is it. The algorithm is an improvement over my previous software, which lumped all daily data from all stations together per month. That unfairly weighted stations which reported more days relative to stations which reported fewer days.”

        You are kidding, right? You must have written this, because that has got to be one of the most junior mistakes when someone wants to determine trends. This tells me that you don’t have a math or statistics background.

        Most climate science deniers simply add temps and divide by the number of stations, and it appears that you did that or something similar.

        There is a lot of math involved in determining trends when data points are not evenly distributed, stations are replaced, TOD changes are made, etc. I’m sure you failed to do account for the necessary changes. I even wonder if you used properly adjusted data or determined that raw data suited your goals.

        • Gator says:

          More projection from the peanut gallery.

        • sunsettommy says:

          Not ONCE have you actually posted a detailed counterpoint to Tony’s charts or his software, which is always available to download.

          You are making a total fool of yourself…….

        • AndyG55 says:

          Tony would rub you into the dirt mathematically.

          You really are TOTALLY CLUELESS.

          How were the Al Gore climate propaganda 101 classes?

          And where is that empirical evidence for warming by atmospheric CO2

          LACKING as always.

          • Disillusioned says:

            “And where is that empirical evidence for warming by atmospheric CO2”

            I have seen any number of variants of the answer below at least a hundred times:

            “Don’t you click on links? I provided you the link!”

            Every time I click the link there is no such empirical evidence. And then they slink away.

            I wonder how many will eventually become disillusioned. The cult-like allegiance and belief in agencies that are supposed to be telling us the truth is pervasive. Although they have no proof or answers for the skeptics, they still believe. It took me years to become completely deprogrammed.

        • sunsettommy says:

          Tony worked for Intel and NCAR, with the needed background for the jobs YOU say he doesn’t have.

          You are so bad at this, that I wonder if you do this on purpose.

  2. Scott Koontz says:

    Reality is here:

    http://berkeleyearth.lbl.gov/regions/united-states

    Notice that I posted a link to a reputable source. In fact, a few skeptic scientists created this graph.

    • kyle_fouro says:

      How do you know that’s “reality”

      • Scott Koontz says:

        It was the denier’s dream! Skeptic scientists funded by the Koch brothers, and Watts’ gave fun approval to their results.

        And they came up with the exact same graphs as all other science agencies.

        That is how we know. That’s how science works.

        • Jl says:

          As opposed to alarmists funded by the government, with infinitely larger pockets?

        • kyle_fouro says:

          You didn’t answer my question….

          • Scott Koontz says:

            All science organizations, working independently of each other, have come up with the same graphs.

            BEST took raw data and ignored all previous work, and took some of the best programmers to create their own results.

            They came up with graphs indistinguishable from those produced by other organizations.

            How could they get the same results unless everybody has been correct all along? That is science. That is reality, assuming you understand what science is.

          • AndyG55 says:

            Best is a massive case

            extreme GI.

            fudge and manipulate as desired.

            the TOTAL GO !!

    • feathers says:

      You are calling “Berkeley” earth a reputable source, seriously? UC Berkeley is the most liberal place in the entire world, I cannot think of a less reputable source.

      Data is data one, plot the unadjusted data points and your imaginary trend disappears.

      • Scott Koontz says:

        Um, BEST is not part of Berkeley It was an independent organization.

        Do you guys not read anything? If I called myself Harvard Research…

        • feathers says:

          I stand corrected – see I’ll admit to being incorrect. It is an odd name for an organization without any affiliation to Cal Berk?

          So what about plotting raw data, why do you all always adjust up? The floor is all yours…

        • AndyG55 says:

          “was an independent organization.”

          Bought and paid for by far-left socialist organisations

          Hardly independent.

          If they didn’t get the desired results they would loose their funding.

      • arn says:

        Berkeley is so reliable and fantastic :
        Besides dozens of ‘experts’ spouting “islam = religion of peace”((those theoretical guys know islam better than muslims themselve and even mohammed))
        and wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars parents have been working for decades
        by tricking their children into useless crap like gender studies((another shit like AGW that did not exist before it was invented in the USA=see a pattern here))
        which can only exist when government create useless jobs
        for these useless people with taxpayer money as noone(as long as you don’t force him) outside of marxist universities
        won’t pay a dime for this shit,

        Berkeley is famous for having professors
        like Eric Clanton who mask themselves and attack other people with Bike Locks because they are unhappy democratic votes or oppinions of other people.
        And such people are teaching philosophy there.

        Of course such a rotten institute that is so deep rooted inside the butthole of Karl Marx is very re lie able.

    • tonyheller says:

      “Skeptics at Berkeley Earth” ROFL
      https://www.technologyreview.com/s/402357/medieval-global-warming/

      “Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate. I would love to believe that the results of Mann et al. are correct, and that the last few years have been the warmest in a millennium.”

      – Richard Muller – founder and head of Berkeley Earth

      • Scott Koontz says:

        You do realize that you just proved my point, don’t you?

        This is hilarious. Do you not know who Muller is and what he said prior to BEST?

        https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opinion/the-conversion-of-a-climate-change-skeptic.html

        You seriously have no idea, and this is getting to be fun.

        • tonyheller says:

          I’m starting to realize that you are just plain stupid, Scott. The date of the article I posted was 2003, fifteen years ago. The New York Times article you posted was from 2012.

          What it shows is that Muller is a liar and the New York Times doesn’t do any actual journalism. Oh. And that you are an idiot.

          • Scott Koontz says:

            “I’m starting to realize that you are just plain stupid, Scott. ”

            Ladies and gentlemen, Tony Heller. This is a man who will defining not debate me in front of an audience for gear he gets flustered and says “I’m starting to realize that you are just plain stupid, Scott.”

            Please agree to debate me in front of students. High school or college, your choice. You have to promise not to embarrass yourself by talking like you write. You are clearly not a scientist, but I’ll debate you anyway. Bring your cherry picks.

          • Gator says:

            Scotty loves liars, they are his main source of info.

          • AndyG55 says:

            You have NOTHING to debate with , koon.

            Rancid AGW pap does not could as science

            STILL waiting for empirical proof of CO2 warming

            waiting.. waiting… !

            Poor EMPTY koon. !!

          • AndyG55 says:

            could -> count

  3. Jeff Jones says:

    Who is Scott Koontz and why should I care? Never heard of him.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Basically a self-aggrandising attention-seeking troll.

      Science sadly lacking.

      Mind totally AGW brain-hose until there is nothing but putrid oozing sludge left.

      A NON-ENTITY with fantasy illusions of grandeur.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.