Tom Steyer wants guns banned and believes 0.0004 mole fraction CO2 is deadly. He is so worried about these things, he believes nuclear annihilation is necessary to prevent them from happening.
Steyer: Maybe We Can Have a ‘Nuclear War’ to Provide a ‘Real Course Correction’ to Trump
Steyer believes we need this :
To prevent this :
Democrats are very angry about Trump making peace with North Korea. It gives them one less thing to be hysterical about.
Something else for the left to get all alarmed about.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-assessing-cost-of-keeping-troops-in-germany-as-trump-battles-with-europe/ar-AAzlSzT?ocid=spartanntp
Back when I attended German jump school in 1988 to get my German Jumpmaster wings we Americans were “welcomed” by a Fallschirmjäger major. I should mention that at the gate of the facility was a WW II German 88 mm gun with 6 white rings around the barrel indicating kills. We got off the bus and into formation and were called to attention and he marched up before us and I swear actually scraped the ground before us with his boots to get it just right for him to snap to attention before us. I swear the guy was full hardcore military and I imagined him right then and there with the SS skull and crossbones on his collar. After he put us “at ease” the one statement I remembered from his “welcome” was “We don’t really want you here but understand why you need to be here…….”. Five jumps with their equipment out of their aircraft including 2 partial malfunctions (the only ones I ever had) later with our German wings on our chests we partied with the German Cadre of the school and had a wonderful drunken time.
I Loved my time in Germany and liked training with the Germans which I did several times and loved the Bavarians and their ways. But Trump is right. We’ve been carrying a disproportionate and unfair burden for the defense of western Europe for most of my 62 year life time and it is long past time for that to end!
Patch Barracks was my home for three years, and I loved almost every minute of it. So glad I lived in Germany while it was still German.
PS – Field Marshal Erwin Rommel’s son was mayor of Stuttgart when we lived there.
Ever make it ups to the Kassern at Vilseck?
No, the closest we came was visiting the Nuremberg area.
Oh before someone decides to try and educate me. I know the WW II German paratroopers were part of the Luftwaffe and not part of the Army or SS.
Science does not care about credentials.
Science does not care how many initials are in front and behind your name.
Science does not care about the number of your publications and citations.
Science cares that the rules are followed.
Science does not waive those rules based on who you are, who you know or your noble cause.
288 K – 255 K = 33 C warmer with an atmosphere does not follow the rules.
396 W/m^2 LWIR upwelling from a BB surface powering a GHG energy loop does not follow the rules.
These two broken rules invalidate RGHE theory.
RGHE theory failure negates any role for CO2 and mankind in the behavior of the climate.
Before we come to class and Range the Sciences, ’tis proper we should sift the merits of Knowledge, or clear it of the Disgrace brought upon it by Ignorance, wether disguised as (1.) the Zeal of the Divines, (2.) the Arrogance of Politicians, or (3.) the Errors of Men of Letters.
-Sir Francis Bacon, “Advancement of Learning”, 1605 (Father of the Scientific Method)
According to rules of science, you need to provide a reference for your claim. Ha Ha.
You never have. You have ZERO-science
You HIDE and RUN-AWAY from science.
You are an EMPTY sad-sack
Me Terak, rules of science…
1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.
2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.
There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.
Still waiting…
Ms Terak, there are smart trolls and there are dumb trolls. Do you know to which category you belong?
It’s asinine that denialists do not produce science, but portray themselves being in the side of science.
It’s asinine that you make unsubstantiated like the one above, and that you refuse to…
1- List all climate forcings, order them from most to least effectual, and then quantify them all.
2- Please provide even one peer reviewed paper that refutes natural variability as the cause of recent, or any, global climate changes.
There is nothing unusual or unprecedented about our climate, or how we got here. For 4,500,000,000 years climates have always changed, naturally. This means there has been a set precedent, and the burden of proof falls on natural climate change deniers like yourself.
Still waiting…
Ms Terak, you obviously do not know to which troll category you belong but your contributions tell the rest of the world.
“terak says:
June 30, 2018 at 2:42 pm
It’s asinine that denialists do not produce science, but portray themselves being in the side of science.”
Yes. It’s asinine. And anti-science. You can stop being a denialist anytime you’re ready to let go of the dogged belief and religious worship of your failed hyped-pothesis.
Oh, the irony.
Says terak the EMPTY
EMPTY of any scientific evidence
EMPTY of any rational thought process
just…. EMPTY !
Scientists do care about credentials.
Scientists do care how many initials are in front and behind your name.
Scientists do care about the number of your publications and citations.
Scientists do not care that the rules are followed.
Scientists do waive those rules based on who you are, who you know or your noble cause.
That”s the current state of scientists.
[Some] scientists are perfectly willing to compromise integrity and support a political agenda based on peer pressure and available funding, scientific method be damned.
Thomas Fart Steyer
1)Morgan Stanley-check
2)Goldman Sachs-Check
3)Hedge Fund Manager heavily investing in “carbon-polluting” investments-Check
4)Private Equity (HELLman and Friedman)-check
The modern day philantroph,therefore no surprise about his nuclear wish.
They dream of culling the population.
“I am tempted to ask for a reincarnation as particularly deadly virus(for humanity)”
Quote from Nazi-Prinz Phillip from the Sachsen Coburg Gotha Holstein
Battenberg(Mountbatton)
posing under the fake Name Windsor
(when using google “metabunk” will appear at the top(as wished by their masters) for this quote while they ain’t debunking anything,but it works to convince average joe)
This quote goes hand in hand with the georgia guidestones to keep earth population below 500 mio.
According to the Book Ecoscience(Paul”i was more often wrong than Hansen”Ehrlich&Obamas Climate tzar Holdren)
the earthpopulation is to be kept below 2 billion.
Ecoscience was written in ’79 the guidestone were built in the 80ies.
So a reduction seemed to have happened.
“Prince Phillip is a Nazi-Gangster”
Al fayed
Maybe the socialists / communists like Ocasio and Bernie and the other Democrats can rise and eliminate fossil fuels like Steyer wants but also take all his money. Lol.
Was referred to a paper:
Trenberth, K. E., and J. T. Fasullo, 2017: Atlantic meridional heat transports computed from balancing Earth’s energy locally. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1919–1927, doi:10.1002/2016GL072475 [Article] [PDF]
Posted in this paper are global energy balance tables with up/down W/m^2 based on 1.0 emissivity and assuming the earth’s surface radiates as a BB.
The only way a surface radiates BB is into a vacuum.
Refer to my modest experiment. Isn’t that how real science is done?
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6394226874976919552
The Instruments & Measurements
But wait, you say, upwelling LWIR power flux is actually measured.
Well, no it’s not.
IR instruments, e.g. pyrheliometers, radiometers, etc. don’t directly measure power flux. They measure a relative temperature compared to heated/chilled/reference thermistors or thermopiles and INFER a power flux using that comparative temperature and ASSUMING an emissivity of 1.0.
The Apogee instrument instruction book actually warns the owner/operator about this potential error noting that ground/surface ε can be less than 1.0.
That this warning went unheeded explains why SURFRAD upwelling LWIR with an assumed and uncorrected ε of 1.0 measures TWICE as much upwelling LWIR as incoming ISR, a rather egregious breach of energy conservation.
This also explains why USCRN data shows that the IR (SUR_TEMP) parallels the 1.5 m air temperature, (T_HR_AVG) and not the actual ground (SOIL_TEMP_5). The actual ground is warmer than the air temperature with few exceptions, contradicting the RGHE notion that the air warms the ground.
Steyer thinks a nuclear war is a better idea than having Trmp as president.
You all see how crazy this line of thinking is, don’t you?
Aren’t you glad ole Donald is running the show? I certainly am. :)
I was stationed at Wildflecken, Germany 1967-68. I too am glad I got to see Germany while it was still Germany.
Steyer wants a nuclear war and Merkel wants to destroy her nation from within. Well, maybe “wants” is too strong. Merkel is just clueless and oblivious to danger. Inviting the enemy into your camp is not a good idea.