Important reminder that the press operates independently, does not have an agenda, and don’t pack their pages full of fake news, propaganda, and lies.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- John Francis on Climate Cancel Culture
- DaveN on Almost The Size Of London
- Terry Shipman on “The Science”
- Moffin on Climate Cancel Culture
- conrad ziefle on Justin Trudeau Discusses Science
Archives
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Collusion? Say it ain’t so.
yea, usually they coordinate their spin in private and then “report” as if what they are saying is an original take despite the fact that everyone of them are using the same phrases or buzz words in their “reporting”. It is soooooo obvious to anyone with a couple functioning brain cells.
Yeah, I love when one media outlet “reports” on something they pretty obviously just fabricated from thin air, then other “outlets” repeat the story. And behind this mysterious scaffolding of lies, there is suppose to be some sort of reality looming. I tuned that crap out a long time ago. I don’t miss it.
Similar to Klimate PseudoScience and the “disappearing” Arctic ice.
These people are “looney tunes.” To combat the fake news accusation by Trump, the Boston Globe make a public call to conspire against him. You can’t make this stuff up.
BTW Steve Goddard, thanks for your work providing this blog.
Isn’t it strange that this happens at the same time as the Alex Jones ban
where several different Giants of the Corporatocracy all of a sudden find out that he violated their rules on the very same day?
(one can only imagine what these monsters have done in communist countries when they took controle of the MSM there
and one no longer wonders that they were able to kill huge parts of their populations with almost no resistence-as there was just one opinion-and that was far away from reality.)
The good thing:This time the way they play is known very well)
Thanks for fighting on the front lines, Tony. We need more like you!
I wonder how many will use the same article ! :-)
I wonder who the big boss is to synchronize the dogs in such an impressive way?
I guess the same who synchronizes the media whenever they want to bomb some country and need another “State Leader became Hitler overnight”.
PS
Just go to youtube and search :Conan O’Brien :A Christmass Present
150 seconds and you may get a clue what is really going on in the media.
The plethora of pure BS that is crossing my MSN newsfeed is astounding. Just a sample.
How Trump Radicalized ICE
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-trump-radicalized-ice/ar-BBLywUA?ocid=spartandhp
Only 100? Isn’t this less than number that normally report decrying Trump’s anti-media rhetoric? lol
Now that they all have banded together, my guess is that they will only make things worse for themselves. For example:
Infowars Website Traffic Explodes After Silicon Valley Blacklists Alex Jones Empire
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-11/infowars-website-traffic-explodes-after-silicon-valley-blacklists-alex-jones-empire
I did not even know who Alex Jones was or what Infowars was about, until this ban came about. After a first perusal there does not seem to be much that is controversial about the articles? The only thought that goes through my head now is that somewhere on the site is something the establishment does not want people to see. Will need to do more research and looking around… sigh
Anyway: This problem could all go away, if the media just do what they are supposed to do: “Report on and publish the news … … and stop making it up.”
Anon; listen to him for a few days, you’ll see why. It’s part news, part entertainment, but very effective.
Johansen, Thanks for that.
You know, if you had suggested that to me 2 years ago… it would have been impossible. Back then I considered Rush Limbaugh to be the extreme of the right-wing. I used to occasionally listen to him for entertainment. But right now, the guy is about the only one making any sense… now I find myself tuning in to Rush Limbaugh just to get a reality check.
I find my old sites and news sources (CNN, WaPo, NYT, etc) just unwatchable and un-readable. They say Alex Jones has 3 million youtube followers, so I guess I am bound to lean something from the guy that I have not thought about? So, what the hell… I will watch for a week and get back to you. Who knows, this was the same way I discovered sites like Breitbart & the DailyCaller that I had no idea even existed.
This was how I actually discovered Breitbart:
https://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php
I felt like I was so out to lunch after seeing that Big Red Circle.
So, it was either continue listen to the people who said that Hillary had a 97% chance of winning (in addition to the Arctic being Ice Free by 2008 and no Wikileaks coverage) or listen to the media that actually got the election results (reality) right.
agreed
Two statistics:
1. Approval of Trump by Republican voters is 90%
2. Media coverage of Trump is 90% negative
Says everything anyone needs to know about the MSM.
Is it OK to just point and laugh?
Thought so.
BWa ha ha ha ha ha ha!