“Scientists Think”

Steve Goddard on Twitter: “Fascinating how humans caused 10C 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to “Scientists Think”

  1. GW Smith says:

    The science is clear! End of conversation! Are you an enemy of the state?

  2. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    “Science is… a game without end. Anyone who decides that a scientific statement can be regarded as verified and doesn’t require further testing, has thrown in the towel and retired from the game.”
    Karl Popper, Austrian-British philosopher

    “The people who are supposed to be experts and who claim they understand the climate are precisely the people who are blind to the empirical evidence… This is the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does a whole generation of supposed scientific experts become blind to obvious facts?”
    Freeman Dyson, Professor of Physics at Princeton University

    “Boys, I may not know much, but I definitely know chicken shit from chicken salad.”
    Lyndon Johnson

  3. Jimmy Haigh says:

    I thought he was supposed to be a ‘lukewarmer’?

  4. Robertv says:

    https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2019/01/electric-car-subsidies-largely-benefit-rich-tesla-and-jaguar-drivers/

    “The government had assumed 11,000 electric cars would be bought in 2018, with an average price of €43,000. Instead, 25,000 were bought for an average of €63,000 each. This, the paper says, means the subsidy scheme has overrun its budget by ‘a couple of hundred million euros’.

    It points out that the subsidies for electric cars are mainly funded by higher taxes paid by petrol and diesel car owners.”

    And in a lot of Dutch cities poor people no longer can go by car because their car is too old. So older cars have been made worthless. Only the rich can go there now with their government funded car.

    That’s how progressives care about the poor. No car no cake.

  5. arn says:

    For hundreds of millions of years humans were 0% responsible for global warming-espacially in the last 3-5mio years since they are supposed to exist.

    But everything changed in the last 3 decades when the global warming arrived scientists of the 70ies have been praying for to save us from the coming ice age .
    That so much desired warming turned by some very strange coiincidence the same day into something evil as co2 did.

    PS
    Zeke’s photo is great.
    Using snow and ice covered cars as prove for global warming?!
    Somewhere an asylum is missing someone.

    • Rah says:

      He’s not crazy or stupid. He’s just a other liar

    • Johansen says:

      And why is he picking on Chevy and Ford only? It’s those Nissan trucks… they’re the ones that really pollute

    • dave1billion says:

      Note the typical trick of using a pic in extremely cold weather that shows a visible plume from the car exhausts.

      A plume of water vapor.

      Same thing we see for power plant pictures that they use. Wait for the coldest day of the year and take a picture that you can use, implying that the stacks are pouring out smoke. The trick is not to actually claim that, but let the image speak for itself.

    • Taphonomic says:

      They’re all pumping out that evil water vapor in sub freezing weather

    • AndyDC says:

      Don’t underestimate the environmental impact of Fred Flintstone’s SUV!

  6. Chris C says:

    In a very weird way, that quote in the tweet is correct…

    Human emissions and *ACTIVITIES* actually have created 100% of the warming. Of course those activities mainly consist of manipulating temperature records to show warming, but you cannot deny that is a human “activity”… :-)

  7. Ed Bo says:

    They can’t even explain the 1910 – 1945 warming, which their analysis says could not be human caused.

  8. Psalmon says:

    This is the ULTIMATE climate change story…Now the Earth IS literally burning up due to global warming…at -30C. It looks apocalyptic, but in the entirely opposite direction of what EXPERTS predicted…Chicago was supposed to have a climate like Arkansas…RIGHT???

    https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1090402748808421376

  9. Bob72270 says:

    “Scientists Think??”….. Since when??

  10. JCalvertN(UK) says:

    Hmm “Scientist s think.”
    You could validly erase the ‘h’ in all too many cases – including that of Zeke H.
    It was someone’s assertion (many years ago) that “100% of warming is due to humans” that caused my first doubts about the alarmist warmist narrative. It was, and is, so utterly stupid, ignorant and unscientific.

  11. Ben Vorlich says:

    Does anyone from NASA/NOAA explain what happens to the two lots of Latent Heat when water vapour from the oceans falls as snow in Chicago?

  12. Troutfly says:

    Off topic perhaps but I have been following intellicast for historical temperature records for years, but now that they merged with weather underground, this information is no longer available (?). This was a great site often going back to the 1800’s and covered most cities. I never found many high temp records in the 2000’s. Any alternate sites?

  13. dennisambler says:

    I love the bit on the twitter feed where they have the warning at the bottom of Tony’s post that says “may contain sensitive material”.

    Being a hardy type I clicked “view”. Lo and behold the “sensitive material” is the Antarctic Ice Core Data chart.

    Not sure if I can take this much sensitivity….

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      I wonder how many twitter users have the courage to click on the sensitive content view box and reveal the shocking ice core data graph. Do they have their phones ready to call the police and report the chart as a hate crime?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.