Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Mikael Reichel on Tornado Outbreak Of February 21, 1971
- paul courtney on With Fake Data, NOAA Can Accomplish Anything
- paul courtney on With Fake Data, NOAA Can Accomplish Anything
- rah on With Fake Data, NOAA Can Accomplish Anything
- Martin on With Fake Data, NOAA Can Accomplish Anything
Archives
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Excellent video. Every member of Congress should see this.
Still waiting for the investigations….
Keep exposing the lies!
At least in this case the old data was or is still available. Have a look at the following:
https://principia-scientific.org/facts-and-fiction-in-satellite-reported-global-temperature/
The author points out with the satellite data, you could alter the data in an undetectable way, with a few lines of code hidden in mundane or routine parts of the code….
In other words some [warmist] cult fanatic could sabotage the satellite data without actually having control of the satellite or data per se….
Or in other words, instead of overtly altering the data as with thermometers the data from satellites could be covertly altered leaving no trace of the tampering in the data record.
Eventually any scheme to fraudulently alter the data would fail, as folks realize reality does not conform with the official partly line – but by then we might have lost all freedoms to do anything about it!
Nah. Never happen. Future desktops will all have AI. We’ll rely on HAL(9000) daily updates on Climate Catastrophe, daily Impeachments, hourly Extinctions and swimming lessons to be ready for the weekly world floods during bushfire horrors famine and overpopulation.
May I very kindly ask you how do you get the raw data? All I can get is the “homogenized” data at NOAA’s Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) @ https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/global-historical-climatology-network-ghcn
I would also be interested in Tony’s opinion on “Fourteen Is the New Fifteen!” @ https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/11/fourteen_is_the_new_fifteen.html
~~~~~
According to the leaders of the global warming doomsday cult, the average surface temperature of Earth is 14 degrees Celsius (57.2 degrees Fahrenheit), but this is a new value which has quietly replaced the original average of 15 degrees Celsius (59 degrees Fahrenheit).
In March 1988, a few months before NASA’s James Hansen asserted
Thanks Tony.
The key question here, in my mind, is WHY DOES NOAA FAKE 50% OF TEMPERATURE READINGS?
There is no logical reason when they have, supposedly, a perfectly good network of stations. You have correctly deduced that they are “making it up as they go along” literally.
Where is Trump on this one? He has his hands full with the corrupt impeachment stupidity, but he should organise an official review of NOAA, and terminate, very publicly, those who are committing fraud here.
Hi Tony
Thanks for another great video. Like you, I won’t accept any orthodoxy without satisfying myself of the facts as best I can. I was until recently blindly accepting the mainstream climate change story.
It was Piers Corbyn here in the UK who was the first convincing sceptic I came across. I want to open my brother’s eyes to this but he sees the likes of you and myself now as “deniers”. This video is very powerful but I have searched in vain for the raw data you show graphically. Where exactly is this available from?
Without that he will decry the message I’m sure. Thanks if you can point me to where I can download the raw data you use in your 1999 and 2019 graphs demonstrating the alterations by NASA.
Tony….I have been communicating with Robert Lee Hotz Science Writer for the WSJ after his recent article on climate change. I complained about NOAA/NASA data manipulation and he sent me several links to review. In one I found the reasoning behind the bias adjustments: ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2/monthly/menne-etal2009.pdf
Can you debunk some of this for us? Also, I recommended he contact you and do a story if he thinks you are not correct in your postings and write a story about it. I hope he does.
Outstanding as always, sir.