Why Data Tampering Matters

I frequently post this animation showing how 1934 was erased as America’s hottest year.

NASA 1999    NASA 2019

Here is a good example of how the tampered data is used for propaganda.

Warmest Winter in U.S. History So Far | Weather Underground

The raw data shows that 1934 was much warmer, and that this year was comparable to many other years.

The number of warm days wasn’t in the top ten.

Weather Bureau maps from 1934 showed how warm the weather was, with twenty degree anomalies in the Pacific Northwest.

01 Jan 1934, 16 – The Spokesman-Review at Newspapers.com

The year 1934 brought heat and drought to the entire planet.

31 Jan 1934, 4 – The Boston Globe at Newspapers.com

30 Dec 1934, Page 13 – The Los Angeles Times at Newspapers.com


22 Jun 1934, Page 3 – Hartford Courant at Newspapers.com

04 Jun 1934 – WORLD DROUGHT – Trove

19 Jul 1934 – DROUGHT IN ENGLAND. – Trove

12 May 1934, 13 – The Guardian at Newspapers.com

19 Jan 1934, Page 10 – The Sydney Morning Herald at Newspapers.com

Similarly, 1932 was extremely warm – the Lake Placid Winter Olympics nearly had to be cancelled.

12 Feb 1932, Page 2 – The Brooklyn Daily Eagle at Newspapers.com

Ahead of the 1932 Winter Olympics in January, there was no snow at Lake Placid, and it was 70 degrees in New York City.

16 Jan 1932, Page 1 – The Los Angeles Times 

February is looking quite cold.

10-Day Temperature Outlook for the Conterminous U.S.

There is no truth to the claims that this winter has been record warm, but the big lie of a climate crisis is built on top of many smaller lies – which are being made at a fast and furious rate.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Why Data Tampering Matters

  1. Rosco says:

    Does anyone really believe that it is possible to record 0.07 of a degree difference ??

    • Matthew says:

      And even if they can, does 0.07 degrees matter? Does it make a difference if the weather is 15 degrees or 15.07 degrees? *smh*

  2. THX1138 says:

    According to ‘direct atmospheric measurements,’ CO2 levels were above 400 PPM in the 1940s… — Science & Technology — Sott.net
    https://www.sott.net/article/428819-According-to-direct-atmospheric-measurements-CO2-levels-were-above-400-PPM-in-the-1940s

    • Don Gaetano says:

      Hey THX, could you for an old working guy just state the point of your link in a brief and clear comment? Followed the link and understand the suspicion of the Hawaii numbers comments, the showing that the warmth of the 30’s caused a rise in CO2 and therefore the cooling from 40’s -70’s happened in a higher CO2.
      Did I get this right?? 70 yr old semi-retired carpenter here, high school ed.
      I’ll say thanks ahead for any response.

    • Mark Luhman says:

      Yes but they did know how to measure temperature/CO2 back then.

  3. Matthew says:

    “this winter has been record warm”

    What? Where? I’d like to move there. If people seriously believe this winter has been warm…

  4. Gayle says:

    MSM is announcing that Antarctica had its warmest day of 65 degrees on February 6th. Previous record was 63.5 on March 24, 2015, at the same location. Can you verify if this is the truth?

    https://www.kcci.com/article/antarctica-just-registered-hottest-temperature-ever/30814802

  5. Josh says:

    The larger point often gets missed. Whether the raw data or the modified data or something in between is “right” is immaterial. If the magnitude of the warming is so small that it can be completely swamped by moving a few stations or simulating a few stations or whatever “corrective” measures they’re applying, then the warming is truly too small to matter. No human, animal or plant can tell the difference between 0.5°C averaged over an entire year. And in fact it turns out neither can our thermometers.

  6. D. Boss says:

    Tony:

    I saw the (warmest winter so far) article on Weather Underground this morning when checking my local forecast. I immediately wanted to inform you so you could refute it, but I see you are already on it!

    By the way, to all those not old enough to remember – why on earth would anyone name their organization after a violent domestic terrorist group?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground

    I suppose their goals are the same so the name is a badge of honor. (destroy capitalism, usher in a new radical leftist ideology)

    Hogwash about this being the warmest winter on record so far.

  7. Winston says:

    No mention of temps at any other antarctic bases:

    Antarctica logs hottest temperature on record with a reading of 18.3C
    A new record set so soon after the previous record of 17.5C in March 2015 is a sign warming in Antarctica is happening much faster than global average

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/07/antarctica-logs-hottest-temperature-on-record-with-a-reading-of-183c?

    NO graph of temp by year found here, just claimed “trends”. Also, base is surrounded by water:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanza_Base

  8. dennisambler says:

    And again:
    http://www.islandnet.com/~see/weather/almanac/arc2006/alm06jul.htm
    HOW HOT CAN IT GET? THE GREAT HEAT WAVE OF 1936

  9. A C Osborn says:

    There is another side to this problem.
    All the current Scientific Research that uses this data will get invalid results.
    All of those Scientists are wasting their valuable time and our Cash to get the wrong answers.
    It has become a very sad and dangerous situation.

  10. These records the Ministry of Truth seeks to “rectify” are the strongest evidence. Physics teachers could assign classes to crowdsource temperatures reported in specific newspapers published over the past 100 years. Resulting excel charts, verifiable until Google news moves source papers to a memory hole, would set an example for data harvesting from back before corporate media controlled by Thought police.

  11. Winston says:

    Tony,

    May I suggest that the issue may not only be the cooling of the 1930s raw data; take a look at the NOAA graph for the years 2012 and 2016 relative to 2019. Why is the NOAA graph showing winter 2019 as warmer than 2012 and 2016, but the raw data (shown by you in the post) has both 2012 and 2016 being slightly warmer than 2019? I find it hard to believe that NOAA is adjusting recent datasets from 2016 and 2012 downward, yet that’s what it looks like. Any comment on this observation?

  12. Mark Anderson says:

    Another article on NASA data tampering. Interesting IG report. Can’t believe this continues…..where’s the scientific oversight?

    https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/nasa-and-noaas-latest-climate-warning-is-a-result-of-purposefully-flawed-data

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.