Windmills Control The Weather

Oxford University says all weather events are caused by the burning of fossil fuels, and that we can end bad weather through the use of windmills and solar panels.

Climate Change Could Cost The Global Economy $23 Trillion By 2050 |

Apparently they could have saved a lot of lives by building windmills during the revolutionary war.

The Deadliest Atlantic Tropical Cyclones

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Windmills Control The Weather

  1. Timo, not that one says:

    “Climate Change Could Cost The Global Economy $23 Trillion By 2050”
    And that’s just to build the wind farms!

  2. conrad ziefle says:

    I think they mean bad weather could cost the economy half that much, because I’m sure they based their projection based on the high end of normal bad weather events.

  3. GWS says:

    What other kind of product can you expect from our higher institutions of indoctrination today?

  4. GWS says:

    Windmills today are just stationary sailboats. The technology has moved on.

  5. Gamecock says:

    Under Net Zero, there will be no economy. No $23 trillion. Neolithic economies will struggle to have a million dollar economy.

  6. spren says:

    All the global warming farce has brought us is a continuous stream of weasel words.

    Could, would, might, suggest… Always a question of probability but never certainty. And when their idiotic predictions never come to pass, they just make new ones and extend the timeline.

  7. conrad ziefle says:

    I’m listening to this Epoch TV episode on the 97% consensus on climate change. I hope you can see it. Very interesting. Check the 5 minute mark. I’m not sure what he means, but he says that a couple of scientists found that it doesn’t matter what data you put into the model that generated the hockey stick, you will still get the hockey stick. So clearly they are not inputting measured temperatures, but rather other factors that then generate a temperature, and it appears that the model is designed to always generate the same temperature pattern. The fact is that, as Tony has said, they don’t have that many actual measurements and they can use whatever method they want to fill in the unknown temperatures.

    • Good stuff. However, the feet of clay are exposed simply by looking at the physics. The greenhouse effect, on which the entire edifice rests, is nonsense. Well established science has been incorrectly applied to the problem in order to contrive a non-existent effect. It is post hoc reasoning originally proposed to explain the high surface temperature of Venus. The actual cause is the exchange of thermal and gravitational potential energy as the gas circulates in the atmosphere, as can be readily demonstrated quantitatively by applying the First Law of Thermodynamics to the problem. Transparency of the atmosphere has nothing to do with it. All indications are that the surface temperature of Pluto is much higher than the black body temperature because phenomena observed there require much higher temperatures. There are no ‘greenhouse gases’ in the atmosphere, but with a depth of some 200km, there is significant gravitational compression as the gases circulate (which they must do in the presence of a negative temperature gradient). It boils down to the inability of alarmists to tell the difference between power and energy. That is the standard of physicist we are dealing with.

  8. Lex says:

    I keep hoping that Tony will include the Great Colonial Hurricane of 1635 in one of his videos. Is one of the many articles on the internet about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.