Settled Science

US temperature data is being tampered with by @NOAA to precisely match the rise in atmospheric CO2. The data is being altered to match global warming theory, which is the exact opposite of how legitimate science is done.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Settled Science

  1. arn says:

    It is fascinating how ,after billions of years the temperature all of a sudden started to follow co2 – just when they needed it.
    This would have never happened without “science”.

    • Disillusioned says:

      …just when they needed it.

      Bingo. And they know to repeat that lie often enough, so the public will believe it.

      (The only people I know who talk about following “the science” are doing exactly the opposite.)

  2. Bob G says:

    CO2 level in St Cloud Minnesota roughly 300, 100 years ago, and now roughly 420 parts per million. temperature unchanged. my good friend Jim who is a school teacher and a looney liberal said he would like to teach me the science behind climate change. we didn’t bother cuz how could he ever explain that one part per 10,000 is controlling the climate. no need to debate that with a friend cuz it’s just not going to turn out well. sad but Democrats seem to think other Democrats are honest with them. it’s just amazing. where did the skeptics go? great documentary currently on Netflix about bernie Madoff. Bernie would have been a great climate scientist. if anybody questioned him he just blew them off. he basically said trust me or get lost. seems to me those are Al Gore’s credentials too. 😁

    • dm says:

      Bob, pls show Tony’s temp. adjustment graph to Jim then tell us Jim’s reaction. This is a sincere suggestion.

      Also, ask him which version of the historical temperature record one should reference. The version used by generation after generation after generation … of meteorologists and earth scientists prior to 2005 or so? Or one of the multiple versions (because of ongoing “corrections”) since 2005? If the latter, which version?

      • conrad ziefle says:

        Perfect suggestion. I’m also curious as to why School Teacher Jim feels that he is an authority. I’m hoping that at least he has a degree in chemistry or physics, otherwise his hubris is laughable.

  3. Kevin M says:

    Corrections don’t seem sustainable. People are living too long. We’ll notice/remember.

  4. Mike says:

    If cancer researchers doctor historical data they go to jail. When “climate scientists” do it they are given tenure. Anyone that can’t see this is a moron.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *