I made this post on March 27, 2015
One of the biggest scams alarmists are trying to pull is the claim that the surface data sets are independent, and they all show the same thing. Carl Mears used that as an excuse to ignore his own satellite data – which shows no warming for 19 years.
There is nothing independent about the data sets. GISS uses the same adjusted GHCN data as NCDC. But it is worse than it seems.
HadCrut didn’t used to agree with GISS, and they were upset about it – so they changed HadCrut to make it match GHCN.
The data sets have been carefully and repeatedly tampered with to bring them to their current fully fraudulent state.
They have almost completely eliminated the 1940 to 1970 cooling.
But it is worse than it seems. In 1999, Hansen lamented that the US data set didn’t show any warming. So he and NCDC got together and changed the US data set.
And in 2008, Real Climate said that the HadCrut decadal pause was too short. RSS is up to 19 years, so they simply ignore it.
Enron accountants would blush at these tactics.
Look for the satellite data to be adjusted to bring it into compliance with the fully fraudulent surface temperatures. The Guardian is now working to discredit UAH, so it seems likely that RSS will soon be making big changes – to match the needs of the climate mafia. Bookmark this post.