Global Warming -> Climate Change -> Global Climate Disruption -> Climate Challenges

11 Responses to Global Warming -> Climate Change -> Global Climate Disruption -> Climate Challenges

1. Pingback: Global Warming -> Climate Change -> Global Climate Disruption … | Pro Earth Forsyth

2. Latitude says:

   January 10, 2011 at 1:59 am

   Change you can believe in…………..

   Reply
3. Baa Humbug says:

   January 10, 2011 at 2:03 am

   This is what we call them here in Oz…….DICK HEADS

   Reply
4. Philip Finck says:

   January 10, 2011 at 2:05 am

   Desperation!

   Reply
5. Bill says:

   January 10, 2011 at 2:26 am

   Of course farmers are “very resistant” to paying a large new tax, higher diesel prices and losing any irrigation water they may have now.
   I think they will find that the term”prolonged drought” also raises plenty of laughter anyway in Eastern Australia at the moment.

   Reply
6. Mike Davis says:

   January 10, 2011 at 2:35 am

   BULLSHIT by any other name will still smell! Shakespeare!!!!! They do not get the fact that it is not the name but the message that is FOS and no matter how much Lipstick you put on a PIG it does not get sexier!

   Reply
7. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

   January 10, 2011 at 3:30 am

   Oh ya, that’s right, climate challenges have never happened before. They’re a new thing caused by global warming. So how much do I pay him?

   Reply
8. Bruce says:

   January 10, 2011 at 4:20 am

   Lets see how far this’ll go. How about:

   Global warming->Climate change->Global climate disruption->Climate challenges->Weather

   Hmm, weather, I like it.

   Reply
9. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

   January 10, 2011 at 6:08 am

   Piers Corbyn, Flood warnings Australia, JAN 12th – 31st

   http://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=294&c=5

   Reply
10. Perry says:

    January 10, 2011 at 11:54 am

    A rose by any other name would smell as sweet, but in the case of substituting “climate change” with “climate challenges”, I smell BS. Honestly, honesty is the best policy, but CAGWarmists are anything but!

    Frankly, it does not matter what phrase is chosen, cultural misunderstandings occur.

    There is a phrase “Call a spade a spade”, meaning to speak honestly and directly about a topic, but even that is open to interpretation. The Oxford English Dictionary records a more forceful variant, “to call a spade a bloody shovel”, attested since 1919. It is clear that the term shovel is used as a comparable but bigger tool than a spade.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade

    Now, you would think that’s all there is, but there’s more. Look at the plethora of opinions at http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/1216064

    In the UK, a spade has a straight cutting edge and is used for digging and turning soil. A shovel is wider, also has a straight cutting edge and is used for shifting loose materials and mixing concrete or mortar. Both are fitted with handles suited for the task, either D or T handles.

    Overseas, there is an implement with a pointed blade and a long straight handle, which is called a round point shovel.

    http://www.google.co.uk/images?um=1&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rlz=1R1GGGL_en___GB351&biw=1024&bih=593&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=shovel&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

    The point is, these implements are useful for digging through the BS and when one discovers the BS emitters, the implement is bloody useful in knocking their sodding blocks off.

    In closing, another series of misunderstandings.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz2-ukrd2VQ

    Reply
11. PhilJourdan says:

    January 10, 2011 at 7:28 pm

    It is getting damn hard to keep up with the PC crowd! 40 years ago it was blacks. today climate!

    How about we just settle on the reality – it is CLIMATE – which implies CHANGE.

    Reply