Nunavut makes up about 98% of the planet.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
Did you mean to have a link to an article?
No.
Well why the %$#$#$ not? It’s ruddy frustrating searching for links.
No links? I don’t believe noneofit 🙂
Exactly. And obviously.
Steve. it’s your blog and obviously you can do what like with it, but these posts are too cryptic for the likes of me.
Annabelle, look at this http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/jra25/2010/jra25_2010_74.png §.-)
It’s an old habit of Steves. He used to be a news boy, got used to yelling out headlines. let me demonstrate.
“Extra extra, read all about it, Nunavut is 98% of the globe, get yer paper”
Annabelle, if I may be so bold?
Nunavut is a village in Greenland. While it is cold there, its temp anomaly is well above the “norm”. Earlier, in November, when much of the world was under a cold spell, many climatologists and media alarmists said that the cold spell was confined to north western Europe and pointed to the Nunavut area as proof of continued global warming. Upon inspection, though, as shown in Ole Heinrich’s map, that area and just very few more places on the globe are the only places that have an above “normal” temp. These conditions have persisted for almost 2 months now.
So, obviously, if Nunavut is proof that GW is continuing and the places that are colder than “normal” are simply small isolated areas, then Nunavut must encompass much of the globe. Personally, I think Steve overstated and Nunavut must only encompass 90%, but that’s just an opinion. 🙂
Hope that helps.
following the CAGW logic of inverting reality, the 3% global area with a positive anomaly becomes 97% of the globe having a fever.
Correction.
Nunavut is part of Canada.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nunavut
thanks James, I sorta figured, but wasn’t sure either……..
Robert, you’re right. Thanks. I do confuse the names of towns. Maybe I was thinking of Ilulissat or Nuuk.
Ok, the anomally map shows warming between and around Nunavut and Nuuk.
Can any one explain why Iqualuit in Canada is so warm. Seems as if there must be some error when compared to other stations in the area.
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/city/pages/nu-21_metric_e.html
Iqaluit’s thermometer is at the airport.
In GISS, all neighbouring stations within at least 500kms were dropped during the Great Thermometer Dying of 1990.
The thermometer is listed on GISS as Frobisher Bay:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=403719090000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
According to this:
http://weather.gladstonefamily.net/site/CYFB
The thermometer is on the tarmac.
Nunavit is extremely important, as we all know the ecology of the Arctic is very, very sensitive. All the igloos are melting and you don’t care!
Hmm, try here, http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_e.html?Province=NU%20%20&StationName=&SearchType=&LocateBy=Province&Proximity=25&ProximityFrom=City&StationNumber=&IDType=MSC&CityName=&ParkName=&LatitudeDegrees=&LatitudeMinutes=&LongitudeDegrees=&LongitudeMinutes=&NormalsClass=A&SelNormals=&StnId=1758&
Interesting to note that here in the hottest decade ever recorded, in one of the areas most affected by AGW, they have only set 2 monthly high temp records, in July and December 2001. Most remain back in the 50’s and 60’s…..
Funny that.