Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Robertvd on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Robertvd on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- John Francis on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- John Francis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
I knew it, the cooling of the 60’s 70’s was also our fault. It was our pollution wot dunnit.
It’s always our fault. Us….the life sucking parasitic vermin on the body of poor delicate pristine mother Gaia.
Kill ’em all, kill all humans so that Gaia can be habitable once again.
This should not be controversial at all. Remember what Peterson, Connolley and Fleck wrote a few years ago in their idiotically-titled “The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus” for the AMS (*):
By the early 1970s, when Mitchell updated his work (Mitchell 1972),
THE NOTION OF A GLOBAL COOLING TREND WAS WIDELY ACCEPTED
, albeit poorly understood
Pardon the emphasis, but it’s there to help the most illiterate among the warmists.
(*) Peterson, Thomas C., William M. Connolley, John Fleck, 2008: The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1325–1337.
lol, stupid memory hole malfunction!!!
I read an article presenting an excellent literature search of peer reviewed articles back then showing global warming articles were predominate. Apparently, global cooling was only hinted at by some scientists but was over endorsed by the media. Yet, global cooling is now happening with the Landscheidt solar minimum, a negative Pacific Decadal Oscillation and increasing cloud cover. We now know that the science of CO2 warming the atmosphere is flawed if not downright dishonest-over 200 ppm, very little additional warming occurs due to the flattening out of the CO2 absorption curve (temperature vs. ppm CO2). The concept of an atmospheric greenhouse effect is also flawed. In the troposphere, convection predominates over radiative effects. Basicly, the warming effects of CO2 have been wildly over estimated.
Like the directors of CRU and NCAR
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?
Pingback: The rsing tide? – Yes, of political damage « 100 DAYS – Claiming Back New Zealand