Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- arn on Fact Checking The New York Times
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- arn on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- conrad ziefle on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Bob G on Fact Checking The New York Times
- czechlist on Fact Checking The New York Times
Considering the January 2011 UAH has dropped back to the 1988 level, Hansen needs all that warming to happen in 8 years.
Yet another failed prediction by a failed charlatan.
How this man still gets exposure, how he still keeps his job with NASA, how he can still look people in the eye is the greatest enigma of the late 20th to early 21st Cs
He still has 7 years left, so the forecast hasn’t busted yet. At this point, however, the trend does not seem to be Hansen’s friend.
Mr. Goddard, I like all the topics showing what these blowhards said and predicted years ago; they haven’t changed a bit, their egos and funding wouldn’t allow them to stop being drama queens.
At least the magazine name fits the report.
This is what soome of our Senators were saying just a few years ago. Actually quite funny to watch.
http://thetruthpeddler.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/just-a-few-years-ago-the-senate-was-blaming-global-warming-for-the-lack-of-snow-in-the-us/
“an increase of from two to five degrees” of what??? I’m being facetious of course – I’m sure he’s refering to the “global temperature” – nevermind there is no such animal;)