Even more impressive is that their data shows an ice-free September by 2015
Your tax dollars at work in an American university.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
I downloaded PIOMAS data a while ago and got an ice free September Arctic in 2015 as well. Something is drastically wrong with their Arctic Ice volume model. Is there any recognition they are diverging from observation, and diverging rather rapidly?
Good enough for government work.
Lazarus will be here to set you straight any minute! 😉
No, Petter Ellis is the PIOMAS Champion.
Sorry! I got my fools mixed up!
So, when the extent is 15% above the (goofy-assed) 1979-2000 mean in 2020, PIOMAS will be modelling an Arctic with a mean ice thickness of what? 0.003m?