[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztz3ZdPbdKo#t=16]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
Recent Comments
- Russell Cook on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- arn on “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- arn on Harris To Win Iowa
- William on Harris To Win Iowa
- William on Harris To Win Iowa
- arn on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Billyjack on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Disillusioned on Harris To Win Iowa
- czechlist on Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- oeman50 on Spoiled Children
They make the most outrageously alarmist prediction they think they can get away with, then say that reality might be less severe than the model but it could also be much more severe than the model.
Shameless.
What’s worse, is that the projections aren’t retracted with the same vehemence as their original pronouncements.
If a poor guess can be broadcast worldwide, its failure in coming to pass deserves the same channels!!!
“projections”! They can never be disconfirmed.
The video was uploaded on Apr 4, 2008, btw. It is about time our govt get out of the climate change propaganda business, especially NASA. But also, apparently, West Point, as C3 says: Memo To GOP: Cut Defense Budget Until Idiot AGW-Warriors Retired From Service.
http://www.c3headlines.com/2014/10/memo-to-gop-cut-def-budget-until-idiot-agw-warriors-retired-from-service.html
Better yet, just clean house. Fire them all for incompetence.
And DON’T HIRE REPLACEMENTS!
NASA Says a Comet is a dirty snowball.
http://k31.kn3.net/taringa/7/0/4/B/9/D/Conclavista/220.jpg
Looks like Al Gore’s Carbon Foot stomping on western civilization.
That tipping point model explains why I keep spilling soda all over! NOW I get it…if I push a glass too far, it won’t recover! Brilliant!
Now…what does that have to do with climate again?
If you knock the glass over the CO2 in your Coke or Pepsi foams and gets released faster than Mother Gaia can soak it up thereby freeing up scads of that Mann made evil gas to kill the planet by incineration… That’s the real reason that Nanny Bloomberg banned large sodas… (I read it in the NYT so it must be true.)
They have been moving the goal posts backwards for the last 45 years.
the most up to date post on the arctic sea ice blog reckons the end of the melt season is just around the corner 🙂 i think the lack of melting ice may finally be getting to neven,he appears to have lost the will.
Dang … I must have been asleep when coffee cup tipping point science was taught … obviously my degree is next to useless with this nugget of knowledge that explains all natural processes so elegantly 😉
/SARC
opps … meant without … coffee hasn’t kicked in yet! An edit feature would be so nice so that foot in mouth, fat finger and general muddle headedness could be fixed.
+1
I think that is why Jo Nova set up her own site instead of using Word Unimpressed.
Brilliant.
I love the technically true comments. If you phrase it the right way, like Al Gore does, then you say “at this rate”…and then make an alarming claim. Because the method of rate measurement is never offered or asked you can always make almost any claim and have it be true. I wish the realists would use similar language.
For example:
Q. Considering the arctic sea ice minimum in 2007, and the arctic sea ice minimum in 2014, AT THIS RATE, in what year will the entire surface of the earth be covered in ice?
RACookPE1978 does:
Of course he goes and spoils it by also saying ” It probably won’t happen, but the trend is there: we have been seeing just under 1.0 Mkm^2 more sea ice each year for several years now. “
The problem is Skeptics are honest. This puts them at a decided disadvantage.
Honest DOESN’T PAY, at least in this era of dirty politics.
Several years ago I sent both Zwally and Serreze emails asking if they would verbally apologize or at least recant in the media, their alarm stories after the ice recovered – which was more inevitable than melting.
Neither of them replied but I know they got them. Only weathermen and climate scientists can keep being paid for being flat wrong.
That is a clear sign that Zwally and Serreze are political propagandists and not scientists.
Where does either scientist on the film claim it will be ice free by 2013?
Andy
Seriously?
The opening statement…the narrator specifically says it.
Of course neither expert flat out makes that claim, but neither refutes it. In fact all their statements go to support it, without giving a specific timetable.
The narrator is a journalist, hence my question. They seem to suggest it is a tipping point, but don’t give an exact date when it would be ice free in that video.
As the narrator was doing a voice over when he stated it how can the scientists refute it ???
I’m giving you a D for that reply, and I am being generous.
Andy
Andy,
It is the collusion between the MSM Pesstitutes and the alarmist scientists that allow plausible deniability that is so nauseating.
Repeatedly alarm the public with Screaming headlines with a text full of innuendos and quotes from scientists but leave an out when the scientists are repeatedly proved wrong.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain…..