The Guardian deletes all comments from skeptics, because their fraud can’t stand up to any scrutiny.
How badly is their paper messed up? Today they censored a comment from an IPCC lead author.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- arn on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Richard E Fritz on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on A Giant Eyesore
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gordon Vigurs on COP29 Preview
- Peter Carroll on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
What happened?….Did one of their useful idiots let the truth slip out?
Today’s Liberal/Progressive does not allow dissent….
The open minded ones cannot tolerate a differing view nor the truth… Violates the Church of Gaia…
I found a copy of the Guardians community standards :
https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.607990571417731477&pid=15.1&P=0
Thank you Steven and Richard Tol for exposing the modern fraud disguised as consensus science.
When the curtain is finally pulled on the Climategate scandal, we will see the ghost of Stalin, hidden from view by unreported events in AUG-SEPT 1945 that preceded the formation of the United Nations on 24 OCT 1945:
http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/10/20/and-yet-there-is-no-supporting-evidence-any-of-this-actually-occurred/#comment-150326
From a comment on China. Confirms that they want to keep them in poverty: Reading comments screams ego and arrogance. They have all the answers and express a disdain for skeptics.
“The children of these people will grow up as middle class.This is more than 2x as many people as in the entire 1st world countries. We can partially blame the ‘West’ for helping to bring these people out of poverty. I don’t think there is any way to stop this.”
This shows so well that socialism is just the politics of envy, at its heart is no improvement in the human conditition just the spreading of the misery; an equal share of misery for all.
Matthew 13:13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
Restatement of
Isaiah 44:18 They have not known nor understood: for he has shut their eyes, that they cannot see; and their hearts, that they cannot understand.
and
Jeremiah 5:21 Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:
or as Matthew Henry (1662-1714) English Presbyterian minister and writer more familiarly put it –
“None so blind as those that will not see.”
Dana Nutticello is a true climate charlatan.
Not able to explain or refute “the pause”, or record sea ice in Antarctica, lowest NA hurricane frequency on record, lower tornado frequency, low US drought index, highest NH snow extent, 60% increase in Arctic Ice Volume, etc., etc., – he resorts to ad hominem attacks on Dr Roy Spencer.
Nutticello deserves derision for his quasi-religious attacks defending his failed climate science movement. The fact that he gets paid for these attacks, means that the Guardian is complicit, no different to the banks who financed the Libor fraud.
Class action lawsuits by customers of power generators, who have been charged extraordinary rates due to carbon taxes and to EPA regulation based on fraudulent science and the propaganda surrounding it, will be coming down the pipe soon.
Notice to Dana: “The Jig is Up”. Look for an exit strategy buddy.
This is what happens when idiots like Nutticello convince people of their climate fantasy.
Demonstrators trespass on private property and cause losses to business, ultimately jobs. Not one person in the Pacific has been relocated because of climate – nuclear testing yes, climate no.
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/anz-centre-in-lockdown-as-environmental-protest-gets-aggressive-20141022-119u5s.html
Yep… I Agree…
Class Action Lawsuit…. It’s the only way…
“Abraham et al. show that a paper by ‘sceptics’ Spencer & Braswell is rife with unrealistic assumptions in an overly simple model”
The alarmists have too much irony in their diet.
PS: “Never mind the bollocks”‘ comment managed to be accepted; makes me wonder what Richard said.
I am proud to have around 50% deletion rate at Huff and Puff Post. They usually delete my best ones though, so I reword and repost, and they stay. Very surprised I’m not banned. Maybe because my posts are fodder for the brilliant wit of the alarmtards.
For example, I was having fun here recently, ridiculing Piltdown Mann and hit disgusting article about Judith Curry.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-e-mann/judith-curry-climate-change_b_6000636.html
That’s a great record, Morgan. It seems your black belt is within reach and Puffington Host will ban you for good.
I recall that Kenji Watts used this technique under one of the more ridiculous articles in The Guardian*). Kenji and his ancestors were falsely and inexplicably libeled by a progressive commenter and Kenji protested the attack. His reply was deleted but the attack was allowed to stay. He rewrote his reply in “nativese” and it was accepted by the censors. All the guardians of diversity are alike.
———-
Huff Post banned my account.
Guardian moderation is strange, they have let through some of my comments I expected to be moderated and moderated some that seemed neutral in tone.
There’s been a sharp increase in ad hom and diversion-style articles of late in the Guardian. It maintains arm-waving hysterics while glossing over the truly dire straits of climate science. And they despise the pause with a passion. What should be cause for the biggest party in Guardian history is not celebrated as good news so much as vilified for being the work of deniers. That reveals all anyone needs to know about their mindset.
that is the madness of it , go to a doctor and he tells you well your blood pressure has been stable for 18 years now you would be pretty happy.
Take a Guardian reporter to the same doctor for the same problem and diagnoses and he would accuse the doctor of being insane and he should be locked up.
In fairness to the Gruaniad, I congratulated them on setting a new standard for self-congratulation.
Abraham is the author of a piece about a piece authored by Abraham. Surprisingly, Abraham finds that Abraham is right.
The Guardian sucks.
Hey! I have been banned by the Grauniad around about 8/9 times now , they do not like dissent it is true, but I have noted two things lately, under my current nomme de guerre I am getting away with a tad more comment ( they did delete my quotation from Hitler about driving home points to the simple minded,,, ,propaganda and the 97%) than previously ,also the attack hounds,of which there are around 6, are starting to have comments removed and whilst there has been no pro sceptic stories ,there is a grudging acceptance of the pause, not from Nutticcelli , he is still driving his 97% propaganda as hard as he can.I suppose that is about all he has left to cling to.
hilarious!
the nutter hard at work still?
ranks of the unemployed/unemployable will swell as time goes on
all the warmists outta work.
The Guardian is a Green obsessed paper. Everyone knows that