It has decided not to trap much heat for the next forty years, but in 2050 it is going to attack the poor people with a vengeance.
Global warming might not be too bad for a few years, but it will likely be a problem for our children and grandchildren, Blasing said. Some parts of the world could benefit, while others will be hurt. Experts predict that so-called grain belts in the United States and Europe will do well through 2050, Blasing said.
“It’s probably going to hurt the poor more,” he said. “It’ll be the rich that come out ahead.”
h/t to Marc Morano
sounds like CO2 will have the same consequences as everything else?
Poverty is the bigger issue and always will be. and am not just referring to poverty of cash
“It’s probably going to hurt the poor more,” he said. “It’ll be the rich that come out ahead.”
Yep! Algore and his cronies. They are using the PT Barnum playbook.
So man made CO2 induced global warming will return just as the Earth is back in its natural warming cycle. Who could have guessed.
It is a plot by them Damn Yankees to make us Suthrn fok look bad.
He is probably one of them Carpet baggers that came down here to ruin the south
“It will be the rich that come out ahead.”
Since when has it ever been different?
Rut row…. Mann soon to be exposed as a fraud..
John O’Sullivan: Court Orders University to Surrender Global Warming Records
‘Yes, Virginia, you do have to produce those ‘Global Warming’ documents’
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=6978
So because CO2 concentration is accelerating, it’s not actually having its full effect yet.. despite what their holinesses Hansen said in 1988, and Al Gore in 2o05? (and subsequent years, for both).
Cue the circus music..
So now its extended to the last century, not just the last 30 years. They really are getting desperate.
If you don’t do what we say…..
….you’re going to be really sorry in about 500 years
well or eventually anyway
at some point in time
you just wait
While CO2 is taking a breather, maybe this would be a good time to inspect the validity and veracity of published papers in respected scientific journals.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/science/06esp.html?_r=2&hp
This is the type of stuff people lend credibility to, simply because it went through pal review.
ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
I knew that already……………………………;)
Key points:
“there was no mechanism by which we could understand the results.”
“Several top journals publish results only when these appear to support a hypothesis that is counterintuitive or attention-grabbing,”
or very PC
The excessive heat waves and crop failures of the 1930s affected our grandparents and great grandparents. So what is new under the sun? We are liable to have another drought sometime in the next 100 years.
So it sounds like the most practical thing to do is work on ending poverty instead of extending poverty with meaningless gestures to “save the planet”.
Of course one of the best ways to end poverty is for everyone to have access to cheap, reliable energy…
How the MSM will report the Apocolypse:
“World to end Today, Women, Minorities Hardest Hit!!!”
Replace rich with resourceful, and you get, “the resourceful come out ahead”.
Well, duh.