Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “ready for the next one”
- Combining Science And Religion
- 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- Disillusioned on Combining Science And Religion
- Yammobethere on 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- Greg in NZ on “ready for the next one”
- Bob G on Combining Science And Religion
- Bob G on “ready for the next one”
- Yammobethere on Combining Science And Religion
- czechlist on “ready for the next one”
- czechlist on Combining Science And Religion
- Robertvd on 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
Something is not calibrated right….
It’s showing a positive anomaly around south Florida and the Keys.
Monitoring water temps is one of the things we do.
We have been below normal all year, and were below normal yesterday too.
Average 1.8 below for the month.
Did you remember to add the Hansenian factor?
I think the map was specifically for yesterday. How does that square with your observations?
we have 9 stations oceanside between the Dry Tortugas and Miami…
All 9 were below yesterday and have been below all year…..
We using probes, so they drift high.
If anything, our direct measurements will be higher, not lower.
Lol, then it is indeed, the Hansenian factor you forgot to add.
Seriously though, like most of these sites, it is almost impossible to find the data source. They mention observed temps and sat. data, but I can’t find what they use where. I’m guessing an extrapolating technique is involved.
ok, they’ve got something major screwed up here….
Go back to their SST for the middle of Feb.
They show a huge pool of cold water off the west coast of Fla.
Tampa area.
That pool of cold water is just now moving around us here.
There are three huge pools of shallow water down here, Florida Bay, Biscayne Bay, and the Everglades. But they only show that kind of heating in still air, the winds been out of the E at 15-20 all week.
It’s impossible for that to be the source right now.
I think the positive anomaly they are showing is some computer glitch, and instead of a + 3, it’s really a – 3.
-3 is right where our measurements are…..
Great. Now Trenberth can devote all of his time to more important things like making up stuff about hurricanes.
+3, -3, was it Steig or Mann who said sign wasn’t important? 🙂