Here is the graph he linked to. Note how temperatures were flat from 1930 to 1980.
This is what temperatures looked like in 1975 – according to NCAR
denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf
It is awesome how Hansen has been able to rewrite history to serve his own ego.
How ironic that Oakden Wolf should mention “perspective”.
Even if the temperature data weren’t adjusted beyond all recognition, it doesn’t prove any connection between it, and humans. How’s that for “perspective”?
The whole theory has always been guilt by association.
Not even the Total Perspective Vortex would be able to destroy an alarmist’s mind…I presume everybody knows why.
Now if they could only get Arabs to feel better about themselves…
Gold!
Global warmers just love that Hansen data!
Ah, the magic of data manipulation. Hansen (no doubt with collaboration from his hockey stick friend at PSU) has managed to eliminate the record heat of 1930s and the “pre-ice age” cold temperatures of the 1970s. When observations don’t fit the theory, just modify the data. Presto, instant global warming.
It is my sincere hope that one day the ringleaders of the climate change cartel will be brought up on fraud charges. They’ve been fleecing the taxpayers for far too long. A penal colony on Baffin Island would be the perfect internment site. The inmates can spend their days counting vanishing polar bears and playing ice hockey, whose main piece of equpment they’re already familiar with.
Why anyone would look at something referenced in that sewer, Tamino Blog, is beyond me.
Or from Oakden for that matter.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
One does wonder how they explain to the world why the graphs and charts of the Little Ice Age, the 30s, Medieval Warming, and others that where mainstream science just a short time ago were all changed. They just change the data like in a George Orwell novel and move on. No one in the mainstream press will call them on that — and certainly no one in the “scientific” organizations will.
Damn it all.
The graphs of the past are seamlessly distorted to reflect their fantasies. A few years ago the Roman and Mediaeval Warming Period were all accepted scientific facts. George Orwell would be astonished how well the proponents of CAGW have followed the methods set out in 1984. No one in the press and media can have read the book or they would have recognized what is on by now. The reporters can never have heard of the Mediaeval Warm Period or the Roman Warm Period either. Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it, or assist in its repetition..
Where are all the chicken littles defending the changes?
The two charts are not comparable. One shows changes in temp and the other shows anomalies, ie divergence from a mean.
One of the stupidest comments I have seen yet