Stephen, please. One can, at least, expect to see the carcasses of dead polar bears washing ashore. (Reminds me that I should drive up to D.C. and watch the bloated carcasses of donkeys floating down the Potomac.)
Memories that that brings up! Beautiful drive!
Is it possible that the first was taken at high tide and the second was taken at low tide? 😉
Or was it supposed to be the reverse of that. The first at low tide and the second at high tide?
Maybe counting the pixels will answer the question! 🙂
Stephen, please. One can, at least, expect to see the carcasses of dead polar bears washing ashore. (Reminds me that I should drive up to D.C. and watch the bloated carcasses of donkeys floating down the Potomac.)
Memories that that brings up! Beautiful drive!
Is it possible that the first was taken at high tide and the second was taken at low tide? 😉
Or was it supposed to be the reverse of that. The first at low tide and the second at high tide?
Maybe counting the pixels will answer the question! 🙂
I think a lot of people can see the difference in the two pictures. Largely due to the quantity of alcohol (Kool Aid) consumed.
Something is wrong with the second photo – John Holdren said it all burned in between the two photos due to drought and increased wildfires.
They are the exact same picture… with the exception of one being made brighter through editing.
The pictures are identical.