Temperatures are forecast to stay in the -35 to -50 degree range. They will need to watch out for heat exhaustion at those temperatures.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
Meanwhile, at the North Pole:
NSIDC is only one showing 2010 crossing 2007.
How unfortunate for them, it really is. What can they say with the man who runs the NSIDC being the source of the infamous “Death Spiral”? How can they explain how this looks?
North Pole ice graphs:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
WOW! I am impressed! They will take a track that no one has taken to compare it with historic data that does not exist and arrive at results that fit the desired outcome. They are probably funded by NAS or NSF.
I’m sorry, are you saying that climate change won’t affect Antarctica, or that it can’t be studied there, or both?
On reflection, I guess there’s a third option, that global warming is already disproved because it’s cold in Antarctica, making any study pointless.
On second thought, why don’t you think before you post?
Interesting that you’ve never made this comment to Amino, who routinely posts multiple replies to the same comment. Here’s one with seven consecutive Amino replies. Yet nary a peep from Blogmaster Steve.
Strange, that.
Say, can you help me with my morning crossword?
H Y P O _ R _ T E
In order to measure a change, you have to have more than one data point.
Are you saying they don’t/wont?