Temperatures are forecast to stay in the -35 to -50 degree range. They will need to watch out for heat exhaustion at those temperatures.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Meanwhile, at the North Pole:
NSIDC is only one showing 2010 crossing 2007.
How unfortunate for them, it really is. What can they say with the man who runs the NSIDC being the source of the infamous “Death Spiral”? How can they explain how this looks?
North Pole ice graphs:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/sea-ice-page/
WOW! I am impressed! They will take a track that no one has taken to compare it with historic data that does not exist and arrive at results that fit the desired outcome. They are probably funded by NAS or NSF.
I’m sorry, are you saying that climate change won’t affect Antarctica, or that it can’t be studied there, or both?
On reflection, I guess there’s a third option, that global warming is already disproved because it’s cold in Antarctica, making any study pointless.
On second thought, why don’t you think before you post?
Interesting that you’ve never made this comment to Amino, who routinely posts multiple replies to the same comment. Here’s one with seven consecutive Amino replies. Yet nary a peep from Blogmaster Steve.
Strange, that.
Say, can you help me with my morning crossword?
H Y P O _ R _ T E
In order to measure a change, you have to have more than one data point.
Are you saying they don’t/wont?