Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
- EPA Climate Change Arrest
- Nothing Nuclear Winter Can’t Fix
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Jehzsa on “pushing nature past its limits”
- arn on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- dm on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Compassion For Terrorists
Phil Jones : Climate Science Misbehaviour Will Be Vindicated By Melting Arctic Ice
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Ok… then let’s wait until then. Then what?
In 7.5 billion years I agree it will be getting a little warm as the sun expands
to engulf us, (or whatever we evolve into or are replaced by… – cue sinister music)
I would also expect AGWers to blame THAT on CO2 as well.
In the interim we have several Ice Ages to survive.
Just nature’s little way of taking the piss out of all of us !
I agree – if they are right (I do not think they will be), then we have time and reason to act.
if they are not (which I think is accurate), then we have saved trillions of dollars that can be used to feed the starving instead of euthanizing them (as is the ultimate goal of many alarmists).
I appreciate Dr Phil piling it higher and deeper because once the winds of reality hit the pile it will bury the CLB organization he belongs to.
Our Phil must feel right at home with that style of reporting… spin the falsehoods… obscure the deceptions. A great example of why the MSM is dying… although dead seems to be more appropriate based upon the stink originating from that article… as Shakespear noted: Something is rotten in the state of
DenmarkNorfolk.Does that mean if the ice doesn’t melt the AGWers will change their mind? Fair is fair.
But the ice will melt… it is due to the Artic PhotoShop Effect that airbrushes all known ice from the Northern Hemisphere but strangely leaves polar bear cubs stranded on floating lumps of, errrrrr, solid water…
Lol, Phil and his idiocy have done more to further the cause of skeptics than anything else, and he’s still at it!
From the story, “Then Muir Russell was correct? Had Jones broken the spirit of the law? “Not necessarily, if you’ve deleted them ahead of time,” he says. “You can’t second guess what’s going to be requested.”
I’m not sure how the law reads in Britain, but in the U.S. if one deletes an e-mail in anticipation of a possible FOI request, it is a violation of law. Either his arrogance is beyond measure or he’s dumber than a box of rocks. I think both.
dumber than a box of rocks is a lovely turn of phrase 🙂
BOTH has my vote too….
I will “tenth” the observation!
It is the known ACC effect!
It is ten times worse than we thought! 😉
The trouble is he will be saying the same thing in 20 years time.
Paul:
By then someone will realize it is caused by Senior Dementia.
So if we go into an ice age soon, does he go to jail?
Banishment to Greenland would be more fitting the crime.
With no ice crampons? Barefoot?
Always in the future, eh Phil, one day we’ll be sorry.
Well, yes. When there’s some actual (i.e. uncooked) evidence, then skeptics will have some reason to take this stuff seriously. Can’t argue with that.