http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_timeseries.png
It baffles me how the Met Office can predict this
Senior forecaster Johnathan Powell
Senior forecaster Johnathan Powell
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
Don’t they say that ‘global warming’ shows up first at the Poles? Doh!
To compensate GISS will have to ‘adjust’ Arctic data more.
Why aren’t NSIDC employees making a big deal out of how much South Pole ice is above the 1979-2000 average like they do about North Pole ice being below the 1979-2000 average? Huh? Why? No mention of a death spiral there? No talk of not “if” but “when” there??
Climate chaos!
You mean the ’79-’00 ice average is considered ‘normal’?
I don’t, if you meant me. I was just saying that NSIDC is selective. Maybe cherry picking is the better way to put it.
I was asking Steve. He put that in the headline.
😉
‘Normal’ to a scientist is a data point within +-1 standard deviation.
‘Normal’ to the average commoner is something he is able to remember and likes.
Stupid commoners. I hate them so much.
If interested in global climate trends, the most sensible way to track sea ice is to look at it globally, not just one pole at a time.
The global sea ice area is here:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
The record shows remarkable stability, with perhaps a slight downtrend over the past 30 plus years.
The ice is infesting Antarctica. It’s an infestation spiral. Run!
OK, I recognize Hansen and Mann, but not the other three. Is this their peer review panel? Or are they the “adjusters” we keep hearing about?
The one on the left is Hansen’s Boss with his mouth covered. Then we Have Gavin the modeler with his Eyes covered. With Mann is his co-author Bradley!
huh. i thought they were clinton, bush, and obama
@Shlub
Shlub, I use a different starting point than most scientists. I start thousands of years ago, when there were no ice caps, so my data indicate that ice is growing at an alarming rate and that the only solution is to pump more ghg’s into the air. Otherwise, we face total frostification. Shlub, I would say 1979-2000 have been unusually high periods of arctic ice, further reinforcing my research.
@Shlub
Shlub, what are your thoughts on the current state of arctic ice? I am predicting massive gains in ice, steadily for the next decade, at both poles.