Thinks he and Nancy are the true gods. Responsible for saving the planet.
http://www.salon.com/news/global_warming/?story=/tech/htww/2010/11/09/john_shimkus_god_and_noah
Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though all inclinations of his heart are evil from childhood and never again will I destroy all living creatures as I have done.
As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.
Genesis 8, Verses 21 and 22
Shimkus comes back with some sharp science, but i think i might have to disagree with, “God’s word is infallible, unchanging, and perfect.”
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7h08RDYA5E&fs=1&hl=en_US]
Good point. Hansen’s word is infallible.
…and unchanging
Context is everything. Just another perfect example of God giving us opportunity for redemption.
Genesis 8:22 is all anyone needs to know on AGW.
It is what He said. And has been. And is. And will continue.
Is that something like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHvf20Y6eoM
Of course what we need is more congress man that believe legislation on matters related to science should be based on trusting God that he would never allow us to destroy the world.
And his “sharp” science. the world had more CO2 during the dinosaurs. How could Hansen ever find a rebuttal to that? But Hansen is never wrong. I am sure you can find a paper he has written where he states that up front.
This whole bizarre mindset that these scientists, even the most emphatic supporters of climate change are unwilling to accept the truth. Show me the peer reviewed science that contradicts them. Steve that paper you posted showed his prediction to be close to reality, yet you insisted that it was wildly wrong.
The paper posted by one of your Guru’s, Spencer, said that Global warming theory is scientifically valid, he just thinks it is not proven. yet everyone HERE knows it is obvious garbage.
Since you are all so smart and see the truth so clearly, please tell me. since it is all so obvious, when the climate scientists are going to jump ship. They have ben indoctrinated so thoroughly, it is hard to image ALL of them blindly falling into the “oh , we actually meant global cooling”.
But if that is the case, please tell me when the peer reviewed literature is going to start using that out!
TonyD:
When the Pal-Reviewers become Peer Reviewers and open minded real scientists are again involved in climate research!