http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AP00D20101126
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/19/thisweekssciencequestions.climatechange
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
I am totally against second-hand smoke, still can’t believe in the 600k figure either.
And talking about it…
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3srOzAWfSh0/SPt99wEhOmI/AAAAAAAAAT0/modMlYVoPgo/s400/Matt+-+Cartoon+01.jpg
“”Two-thirds of these deaths occur in Africa and south Asia,”
where they are probably cooking and heating with indoor fires.
what they need is electricity
Weather check ‘could predict’ A&E injury rates
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11841889
They probably needed a climatologist and statistician to come up with that common knowledge.
What about consultants too?
Steve do you believe that second hand smoke is a danger?
I ask because one climate expert (apparently) that deniers like to reference is Prof. Fred Stringer, who doesn’t believe in AGW, is also a medical health expert (apparently) who doesn’t believe second hand smoke is harmful either.
Easy is the life of the Manichean
Doh.
It was a simple enough question; Do you believe that second hand smoke is a danger?
It kills four times as many people as global warming. Do you have difficulty reading?
LAZ:
Do you believe that beating your wife is a Sin?
The entire group of ACC promoters appear to be Sadists and Masochists in which case they promote beating their partners.
“It kills four times as many people as global warming.”
So you do accept this then. It seems ironic that you also accept the opinion of a scientist that has denied this could be a problem.
I’m just trying to establish where your confirmation bias and uncritical thinking meet.
It seems ironic that you spend so much time playing word games