http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AP00D20101126
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/19/thisweekssciencequestions.climatechange
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6AP00D20101126
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/19/thisweekssciencequestions.climatechange
I am totally against second-hand smoke, still can’t believe in the 600k figure either.
And talking about it…
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3srOzAWfSh0/SPt99wEhOmI/AAAAAAAAAT0/modMlYVoPgo/s400/Matt+-+Cartoon+01.jpg
“”Two-thirds of these deaths occur in Africa and south Asia,”
where they are probably cooking and heating with indoor fires.
what they need is electricity
Weather check ‘could predict’ A&E injury rates
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11841889
They probably needed a climatologist and statistician to come up with that common knowledge.
What about consultants too?
Steve do you believe that second hand smoke is a danger?
I ask because one climate expert (apparently) that deniers like to reference is Prof. Fred Stringer, who doesn’t believe in AGW, is also a medical health expert (apparently) who doesn’t believe second hand smoke is harmful either.
Easy is the life of the Manichean
Doh.
It was a simple enough question; Do you believe that second hand smoke is a danger?
It kills four times as many people as global warming. Do you have difficulty reading?
LAZ:
Do you believe that beating your wife is a Sin?
The entire group of ACC promoters appear to be Sadists and Masochists in which case they promote beating their partners.
“It kills four times as many people as global warming.”
So you do accept this then. It seems ironic that you also accept the opinion of a scientist that has denied this could be a problem.
I’m just trying to establish where your confirmation bias and uncritical thinking meet.
It seems ironic that you spend so much time playing word games