Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Greg in NZ on Ellen Flees To The UK
- arn on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Disillusioned on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Russell Cook on The End Of Polar Bears
- Russell Cook on Ellen Flees To The UK
Also that article is full of flat out falsehoods. Note how it says “scepticism about global warming” rather than AGW. That is a favorite of the left. Distort the truth, state it as fact.
You don’t think Steve is skeptical of global warming? If he isn’t, what’s with all the “It’s cold today in South Cupcake!” and “No warming ever in East Tallulah!” posts?
ChrisD:
You still do not have a clue even though many have been given.
Lets try this one:
It does not matter whether it is warming or cooling. Those are naturally occurring weather conditions.
They have happened in the past and will continue to happen in the future. It is nature. The problem is blaming humans for being the driving force behind climate that is within bonds of all past climate events throughout the history of the world.
No one is sceptical about Global Warming. Leave off the A and we can all join hands to sing Kumbaya. Of course you would have to provide independent evidence that the globe has really warmed because the people who maintain the current records are trying to hide something. If they were not they would have given /shared their data rather than requiring FOIA. The e-mails would not have been quite as inflammatory either.
the current regime has provided sufficient proof of their not being trustworthy.
Your blind faith puts you in bed with the group.
This is about Obama not listening. It has nothing to do with me. Every time you weigh in you try to change the subject.
You don’t think Steve is skeptical of global warming?
What a straw man. You’re in your usual form ChrisD.
By the way, is there a difference between global warming and ‘manmade’ global warming? Jus wondrin.
Steve: Mike changed the subject, NOT ME. I replied to Mike. Bitch at him, NOT ME.
By the way, is there a difference between global warming and ‘manmade’ global warming? Jus wondrin.
Of course there is. Apparently you didn’t read Mike’s comment and my reply very well. Or you didn’t understand them.
ChrisD says:
Steve: Mike changed the subject, NOT ME. I replied to Mike. Bitch at him, NOT ME.
———-
Wow. You replied to someone *BEFORE* they posted (and their post was in reply to *YOU*). That’s a good trick:
ChrisD says: November 4, 2010 at 3:36 am
You don’t think Steve is skeptical of global warming?
Mike Davis says: November 4, 2010 at 4:00 am
You still do not have a clue even though many have been given
stevengoddard says: November 4, 2010 at 4:12 am
This is about Obama not listening. It has nothing to do with me. Every time you weigh in you try to change the subject.
And Chris, Steve is right. You tried to change subjected by taking a pot shot at Steve, just like you’ve done on many an occasion in the past. Really, do you think noone sees what and how you post every day on this sight?
Wow. You replied to someone *BEFORE* they posted
Oh, you couldn’t have figured out that I meant truthsword, not Mike? Yes, that was my mistake, but how hard, really, would it have been to work that out?
And Chris, Steve is right. You tried to change subjected by taking a pot shot at Steve, just like you’ve done on many an occasion in the past.
No. TS says that the article deceptively “says ‘scepticism about global warming’ rather than AGW. ” But there are, in fact, many people who are skeptical about global warming, i.e., they argue that it’s not warming at all. I used Steve as an example of such people for the obvious reason–he’s right here, and everyone knows his position on this.
It was not a “potshot” at Steve; he is simply an example of someone who appears to be “skeptical of global warming.”
ChrisD says:
It was not a “potshot” at Steve; he is simply an example of someone who appears to be “skeptical of global warming.”
—————-
Considering you posting history, yes it was a potshot, and even (for the sake of arguement) if it wasn’t it was still off-the-topic as Steve is *NOT* a member of congress (new or otherwise) and the article’s mention of “skeptical of global warming” is in relation to “the newly elected members [of congress] have expressed skepticism…” so your so-called example fails on all counts.
This is pretty simple, John.
The takeaway from TS’s post (or, at any rate, my reading of it) is that people are not skeptical of global warming, they are skeptical of AGW.
Steve appears to be a person who is skeptical of global warming. I pointed this out.
That’s really all there is to it.
This is pretty simple, Chirs.
TS made a comment *about the article*. You used that as a spring board to take a potshot at Steve (which fits your posting MO) rather than to comment on whether or not the articles description of “skeptical of global warming” was an accurate portrayal of the new congresspersons (as that is the only thing the article attached “skeptical of global warming”). Steve isn’t the topic of the article. Steve isn’t mentioned anywhere within the article. Trying to making it about Steve is just you taking a thread off the rails as you usually do.
TS made a comment *about the article*. You used that as a spring board to take a potshot at Steve
Yes, his comment *about the article* seemed to be that nobody is “skeptical of global warming”. That is not the case. Steve appears to be (and so do many others). That’s all I said. You’re making something out of nothing.
If Steve is not “skeptical of global warming,” which is what TS didn’t like in the article, I wish he would say so.
Good on em! Put the intelligence challenged element of the EPA in check. Maybe a redressing that would include a severe cut in funding would be in order too.
“We know that greenhouse gases are pollution.”
–Lisa Jackson, EPA Head
At least the tax break cuts to the oil industry would save some money. Oil companies are hardly in need of tax breaks anyway
Andy
Tax breaks for the oil companies encourage them to drill here. Since the USA continues the reckless 35% corporate tax rate. If we don’t provide the tax subsidies the oil compnaies will move elsewhere and we will have to continue to buy oil from foreign countries.
Drop the rate to 10% (maybe 15), get the enviro-freaks to crawl back into their cave and we could qucikly have complete energy independence.
Since the USA continues the reckless 35% corporate tax rate, if we don’t provide the tax subsidies the oil companies will move elsewhere and we will have to continue to buy oil from foreign countries.
““Cap and trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way” Mr. Obama said in his press conference Wednesday. “And I’m going to be looking for other means to address this problem.”
Run for the hills!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/nov/03/obama-green-agenda-crushed-midterm
“We are beating Texas again,” Schwarzenegger told supporters at an election night party.”
http://blog.american.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/joblessrates.jpg
Disestablish the EPA. Let ’em all get real jobs (that oughta be a good one in this economy). I guess Ms. Jackson might be able to pull down a temp job in the janitorial/housekeeping field.
Don’t you guys see it.
Obama is the ring leader of a blue collar criminal gang pulling the biggest scam in human history. He and his friends with the UN and the EU turn us into slaves while they steel the entire planet.
Nothing new here because It happened in the past on a similar scale and it founded the basis for our blue blooded dynasties who managed to cover up their crimes and live on as Kings and Queens escaping the torn of the people who of course were cheated and lied to with their eyes wide open.
Today The University from Tilburg in the Netherlands awarded Al Gore with and honorable doctorate because of his relentless efforts to inform the world about the problem of Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Obama received the Nobel Peace Price before he even lifted a single finger.
That’s how our current day criminals receive public absolution for their crimes and a basis for a new dynasty.
Yes, history is repeating it’s self.
I say stop the robbers and lock them up for life.
Thank God for the Tea Party.
New Mexico takes the lead following California over the Cliff
http://ecopolitology.org/2010/11/02/prop-what-new-mexico-quietly-adopts-countrys-most-aggressive-greenhouse-gas-rules/