Highlighting the failure of last year’s Copenhagen climate summit, the report called for international commitment at events such as the U.N.-sponsored climate talks to be held in Cancun, Mexico, next month, “if we are to face up to what may be the most serious threat the world has ever faced.”
Wow. Those little tiny molecules we exhale are worse than World War, Plague, Smallpox, Polio, Nuclear War, Malaria, Drought, Famine, Communism, Fascism, Earthquakes, Volcanoes, Asteroids, and Religious Fanatics.
I hear that there are people in Berlin hiding CO2 refugees in their cellars.
Are these people completely mental, or do they just think everyone else is stupid? Or both?
Maybe the most serious threat the world has ever faced is the UN/Al Gore/ClimateGate scientists/global warming politicians.
Shirley they jest. What about UN peacekeepers raping scores?
Your link is to Grist – so the answer to your question is: “both”.
Grist calls Texas politicians “climate zombies” even though Texas has no warming (See: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/Texas.htm
Well I think that the US military made a similar proclamation a while back about it being the single most important national security issue. I suppose those “liberal” soldiers are “in on it” too eh goddard?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmv3NAO9sRc
well, the military, even the cia, are supposed to be undercontrol of the civilian government. general officers are political appointees.
although what it comes down to, is they all work for the bankers.
it’s all about $$$$$$$$$$
peterhodges
No where in the video does it say the military regards climate change as a threat.
All the people in the video except one were formerly in the military. The one that is currently in the military didn’t say anything about climate change being a national security threat. He talked about using less fossil fuels, though he didn’t specify in what vehicles.
AAM:
You must not be using the correct interpretation of what you heard. clearscience would not in any way attempt to mislead any more than Sinclair would do a thing like that.
What ‘soldiers’ are you talking about? It isn’t clear.
AAM:
One only need to see the handle to realize nothing will be clear from a self promoter of clear science especially when they link to such experts as Crock of the week!
he said
“I suppose those “liberal” soldiers are “in on it” too”
He made a blanket statement about all of the soldiers in the military when the video shows only one soldier, Christopher Miller, who has become an activist for “progressive” politics.
clearscience,
That video is ridiculously biased. It will effect your reputation. But it could be that you want the reputation of being associated with it.
Nothing more can be said to change Clearscience’s rep!
Maybe so Mike.
This may just be me, but I am guessing that if you want an independant critique of the policies being persued by our political masters, then the military are probably not the best people to ask…….