They can just send the scientists home and quit pretending that this has anything to do with science. The results have been pre-determined and the next IPCC report will be even “worse than the last one.”
Difficult to imagine that Pauchuri could do worse than he did last time, but that is what they are promising. How can there be any remaining doubt that this process is fraudulent?.
One important lesson: government is coercion. National or international/multilateral govt bodies, they all exist to perpetuate themselves. Lie if they must, fool and scare the public if they must, and bastardize science if they must, so long as their political agenda will proceed.
So the sky is falling even faster??
What much worse? They will quote Playboy instead of Climbing magazine?
Hustler…. 🙂
That ‘deniers’ siren call’ should be accompanied by flashing blue lights
and uniformed police as climate fraudsters are brought to justice.
Its worse than we thought!!? Who would have thought!
It’s worse than I thought, worse than when I already thought it was worse than I thought. Oh, my! This is worse than I thought.
And now, introducing the new, improved “even worse than we thought” Kool Aid. Eight out of ten idiots say they will drink it.
*Disclaimer: Contains bullshit.
We can help them with new alarms. Let’s see, this needs to be good.
1. The Arctic is so hot, it has turned into Magma? Inuit rush to the beach, scoop up free boiling seafood chowder?
2. The ice caps exploded, Polar Bears seen hanging ten off the incoming tidal waves?
3. The Amazon has turned into the Gobi. The Gobi to glass?
4. Pine beetles the size of Rottweilers are invading Denver, eating children?
5. Hookers in Cancun won’t take Visa?
#5 Would end the conference before it even gets started!
Phil Jones last week said that he couldn’t see AR5 being any different to AR4, and he should know cos he can make it so. It’s all been decided that in two years time it will be worse than we thought..
There was another Lead scientist that said AR5 would provide more uncertainties to match what is really known about climate where uncertainties have been minimized in the past.
It is worse than proclaimed because they do not know as much as they claim to know!
The IPCC will have to form a “Rabid Response Team” to whip up some new model findings to scare the bejesus out of us.
I guess the other group is just guilty of misspelling their goal. I also often accidentally use p instead of b when tybing! 😉
Rabid is much more apt.
They really are aptly named — each of them is foaming at the mouth.
When is the next IPCC report due out? In about 3 years? I actually hope the report IS WORSE than the fourth. Especially if temperatures drop in the next 3 years due to the solar cycles and PDO/AMO/ENSO activity (from what I have read, that is a possibility). Then the IPCC would look like bigger fools then Hansen . . . ! 🙂
Nonoy Oplas says:
November 23, 2010 at 5:55 am
One important lesson: government is coercion.
yup. especially when it is owned part and parcel by large banks and corporations.
don’t they have a name for that?
I have no doubt that AR5 will be worse than AR4 – quality-wise. Google “IPCC Munich Re” and you will find an interesting connection.
They are brainwashing the population with their propaganda. Remember the book written by Noam Chomsky…..” Manufactured Consent ” …in which the basic premise is that the population has to buy into a government scheme, and to do so, they have to manufacture whatever it takes to get the vote of the populace. Look at the Iraq war…lied our way into it, also the war in Kuwait….remember the woman testifying in congress about the iraqi soldiers tossing babies out of incubators and stealing the incubators… ( all lies, and the woman was the daughter of a niece of a sultan )…anyway, you get the picture. The IPCC want to start the brainwashing kids at a younger age, as they know it is working…us older thinking men won’t fall for it.
Ian
Are you sure you’re not interpreting this sentence incorrectly:
“Robert Orr, UN under secretary general for planning, said the next Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report on global warming will be much worse than the last one.”
That could easily be interpreted as the content of the last IPCC report was bad and the next one will be worse.
Have I ever written an article that wasn’t full of double entendre?
Bob:
That would be an admission they are probably not ready to make, even if true!
Pingback: Climategate.nl» Blog Archive » IPCC: “Ook gij Ivo?”
“…the IPCC report will be much worse than the last one”
Does he mean the predictions, or the scientific quality of the report?
The latter would be awfully tough to beat.
They’re willing to try, though, and you have to admire such tenacity. (Wait, only kidding, there’s nothing in these doomsayers worth admiring.)
For IPCC, Cancun, and the Chicken Little Brigade:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_H-LY4Jb2M
If it’s much worse, why wait until 2014 to release it? If it’s so critical for the planet, why wait? They obviously have this “accelerating” data to show us. So show us this data NOW!
Well, well, well but if Mr Orr isn’t getting ahead of the game. Is this a real problem for him the premature-business?
In an article in Nature (“More knowledge, less certainty”,
http://www.nature.com/climate/2010/1002/full/climate.2010.06.html)
Kevin Trenberth says:
“So here is my prediction: the uncertainty in AR5’s climate predictions and projections will be much greater than in previous IPCC reports”
This is a tacit admission that their AR4 predictions were much less reliable than they claimed in AR4. It also means that climate is much more complex than they previously assumed and that they have much less confidence in their predictions now than in 2007.
It is insane for the USA (via the EPA) to contract out climate science research/findings to the UN/IPCC.
Apparently Dr. Orr is a doctor of International Relations. A distiguished one though.
http://www.un.org/ga/president/62/ThematicDebates/bios/orr.pdf
HEY! That definitely qualifies him as a Climatologist!!