They tell us that the world is going to run out of food in ten years.
At the same time, they turn food into fuel because they are afraid of petroleum.
At the same time, they shut down half the farms in California because of imaginary concerns about a fish.
At the same time, they want massive taxes on fuel which will make food prices skyrocket.
In other words, they are either engaged in a concerted effort at genocide, or these people are complete lunatics. Or both.
both i think ….
oh, i think the concerns about the delta smelt are real enough, but I think their intent to bring back a species sitting in one of the most heavily populated and manipulated environments from the brink are somewhat unrealistic and disproportional.
for instance, the griz were wiped out from california but nobody in their right mind would countenance their reintroduction into… say Berkeley ….wait – perhaps that would work out ok …..hmmm
It’s both.
Here you find the lunatics and their sick plans.
They think of humanity as a pest and they want to control and reduce it.
Starvation is their weapon of choice but other options are discussed.
Pay a visit to this site and read all about these wacko’s and their criminal schemes.
http//green-agenda.com
Both, but, again, it’s pathological, but, I’m not sure what, exactly, one calls it.
Definitely attempted genocide but I would not call them crazy or lunatic. Now sly like a fox, devious, greedy, criminals would all apply for these characters are raking in hundreds of millions per year, right now! Crazy? Thinking that would only make us look foolish, gullible. I just posted a tip at wuwt you all should read and then tell me if you would then apply the term “lunatic”. They are MUCH, MUCH more dangerous than that.
Gets into the near billion dollar money laundering about halfway down…
(and no one know the real total amount)
http://www.financialpost.com/cash+sands/3675309/story.html
I agree they are far from being lunatics.
They’re far more dangerous than lunatics.
Excellent article. With the “eco” crowd able to throw around that kind of money I now see how all of these outlandish CAGW articles get published. They’re bought and paid for by outfits like the Tides Foundation. Newspapers have given up trying to sell newspapers to the public they just sell newsprint to “eco” special interests as if it were ad space.
This money also explains why an urban guy like Obama, who can barely keep a straight face when talking about ‘climate change,’ is ballz to the wall pro CAWG agenda and has shut down oil drilling in the USA.
Can the average Joe prevail against a Malthusian Oligrachy with nearly unlimited funds?
Thanks for that link. Here’s a quote which illustrates what it is all about:
a project to support people with HIV in Indonesia got US$9,998. In comparison, Greenpeace got US$186,000 and the World Wildlife Fund got US$160,000 to campaign against Alberta oil.
Yes – it is about genocide, and yes, they are dangerous lunatics.
I’m amongst those who this despicable lot would like to see freezing to death, due to higher and higher energy prizes.
Well, I’ll do me best to thwart them! And sod the childrens’ inheritance!
Misguided…
With this in mind, now why would the MET office consistently and deliberately make seasonal forecasts that are 180 degrees off?
SO that local governments are ill equipped to deal with ordinary weather events, which are reported as weird weather or extreme weather “most likely due to climate change”?
So pensioners die off in the winter cold maybe, with casualties cynically reported by the Guardian as “victims of climate change”?
Oh you betcha.
I never thought I’d see the day that I would be happy about Republicans taking control of Congress, but we desperately needed somebody to keep these people from destroying us.
another vote for both