http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10697845
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Gordon Vigurs on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Ed on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Walter on Ellen Flees To The UK
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
- William on Ellen Flees To The UK
“As a climate scientist thinking about this, it struck me that it was not surprising since accounts of the scientific basics of global warming almost never appear anywhere in the press.”
Heh, maybe because there are no actual real “scientific basics” for AGW. Just models and theory.
“Theory” that is easily dispelled, but we ignore that and play “as if” anyway.
This is Lysenkoism all over again! The idea was demonstrated to be bogus time and again, yet was used as the basis of a State-planned economy.
Thank you Brian,
I have been saying this must be the case for weeks now and Steve refuses to accept it. Surely you will now be roundly attacked for using my argument.
This analogy is so much closer to this case if ACC is fraudulent than the very poor analogies Steve keeps putting up, and when I show him how inadequate they are and how accurate the lysenko analogy is, he changes the subject or ignores it.
Tony Duncan,
You were waiting for my replies last night. They are there. I see by the time on this comment
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/puffington-host-incestuous-bees-to-starve-us-all/#comment-28146
you were there, but didn’t respond.
More proof out just how out of it climate scientists really are………….
I think he’s right.. the basics aren’t reported much in the media; most of it is non-scientific sensationalism.
From Hansen, the head climatologist.
the quote I like is
” whereas sceptics point to the four-billion-year-old global climate record that shows runaway global cooling or warming has never occurred because negative feedbacks regulate the global climate system.”
Mike will be surprised to learn that there have never been any ice ages or extremely hot periods in earths past.
Also that he says that that tiny minuscule trace gas can increase tempt by 1°C all by itself without any forcing.
But maybe he is right, and everyone on this site agrees with that. Certainly Lindzen, Spencer and Michaels do.
News just in.
4 January 2010
Met Office knew big freeze was coming but hushed it up
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343863/Met-Office-knew-Decembers-big-freeze-coming-hushed-up.html
Last October, when the UK Met office was predicting a mild winter, they knew they were lying to the public, in order not to undermine the COP 16 conference in Cancun with acknowledgment of the brutal winter to come.
Interesting fact: the Chairman of the Met Office board, Robert Napier, is or has been:
* Chairman of the Green Fiscal Trust*
* Chairman of the trustees of the World Centre of Monitoring of Conservation
* a director of the Carbon Disclosure Project
* a director of the Carbon Group
* Chief executive of the World Wildlife Fund UK
He is also a member of the Green Alliance.
Has anybody read the article. I just did and this guy is actually saying something of merit. He is not saying we are all going to fry , he is injecting a little common sense, a sciencetist actually saying we do not know and hold on before we spend billions on this.
100% guilty as charged…
…someone send that man a thank you note, or at least post it in the comments
This was a nice article.
There is an easy to understand explanation by Reginald Newell about feedback from increased co2. What is talked about in this video is being overlooked in the media.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofFShSlv8eA
The science is badly flawed, thus the press doesn’t want to talk about that aspect. They just want to spew propaganda, not science.
No Andy , a journalist inserting press releases instead of actually looking at and investigating the story , OK yes propaganda. What will they think of next, stay tuned for more action news. The crap they come up with boggles the mind!