To get a job as an environmental reporter, you apparently need to demonstrate that you are incapable of logical thought.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
The MSM all appear to take one garbage study and twist in to whatever fits their agenda. CSM should stick to their own faith based religion rather than dabbling in pathological science also!
My little dog hates the retreat of snow and ice. She gets so used to doing her bizness on it that she finds less and less area to do her stuff as it retreats.
This is a serious problem !! We need more snow and ice ——- wait …. snow has started — good……never mind
This is maddening. There is no basis for the premise! Steve, while you like to show winter, I’ll show the other two seasons…..
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=4
and
http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=2
Some one please correlate temps to snow coverage or visa versa. Neither one lags the other sometimes when its hot the snow coverage is high, other times when its cold the snow coverage is low, other times it is high/high or low/low. It’s crap! And it takes all of a few of constant interrupted hours to see this with a simple Excel program. I’ve looked and can’t find it even looking for obscure connections. How do they get by with this?
Christian Science Monitor
Pray to God Screw the the science and people.