But imagery of murdering school children is OK.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
I don’t like the Sarah Palin crosshairs thing either. But I think she did it innocently, maybe taking a jab at the anti-hunting crowd, and nothing more. To go on to blame her for what happened on Saturday is way out of line—it is rabid political dogs who would do that. Why aren’t these dogs pointing out how the man had Marx and Hitler on his favorites list?
Because Tea Party folk don’t read that stuff. The media obviously wants this person to not be a pothead lefty.
Using terms and visuals related to targeting opponents has been common practice for years. For anyone in the Media of political arena to bring it up as a negative now shows a level of ignorance on the part of the person making the claim and the editor that allowed it to be published. The politicians have script writers they use for any speech and it appears they need to find new speech writers because their current ones are ruining their careers.
First, exploding climate skeptics, now with Giffords shooting – “The Far-left ‘Jumps the Shark’ over Tucson Tragedy” http://biggovernment.com/rcook/2011/01/12/the-far-left-jumps-the-shark-over-tucson-tragedy/
Excerpt: For those unfamiliar with “jumping the shark”, I’d strongly suggest looking up this Hollywood idiom. It appears we are witnessing this in epic fashion as the far-left shamelessly exploits violence for the second time in four months: first, the fake explosive executions of climate change doubters in last October’s 1010global.org video; now they agonize over the very real Giffords shooting. Both showcase the far-left’s attempts to marginalize and silence their critics, while spewing the same kind of vitriol they ironically claim should end.
I agree they jumped the shark. Like most things, they over used a tactic that worked a decade ago. But fortunately, most people cannot be fooled all the time. As they double down on this, I suspect it will backfire on them as everyone who is anyone of knowledge on this has already told them they are full of dookie.
I don’t run out and buy Preparation H just because I saw a commercial for it either….
…what kind of dumb shit listens to any of this crap and actually does it
You can’t protect the mental from themselves
Well, I guess we’re even then, I’m against the use of the guardian.