As soon as the temperature gets above 0F, I am going to go protest global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
They need to cut funding to NOAA because NOAA has become an activist orginization and other NGOs should pick up the tab for their propaganda agencies such as NOAA and NASA along with EPA!
Due to known errors this decade tied with the 30s and there was no statistically significant difference in reported temperatures as all the temperatures in the last century have fallen within the known errors that are inherent in equipment and methods.
The fix was in.
i am sure if you look at an actual record from any specific (non-UHI) location, it would tell a different story.
Isn’t it amazing how such a record can come in the midst of one of the three coldest ice ages in the last 600 million years? Click here to examine the citations for the data sources.
Isn’t it amazing how the significance of the latest data is in the eye of the beholder?
If our top sceintists say so with the blessing of their peers, it must be so, even if they are all feeding from the exact same trough!