All scientists believe that global warming will soon kill us all. Conservatives are ignorant fools who occasionally can be pulled back from the brink . The planet is definitely heating out of control.
———————————————–
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/
Man, that chart looks nippy!
Wow, she wrote a book? Just how does one write a book “explaining” climate change, er, uh, GCD? Do you just tell people to straighten up and buy a “Pius” or else there will be an earthquake? This has always puzzled me.
“All scientists believe that global warming will soon kill us all. ”
Actually, the American Meteorlogical Society’s yearly survey of members refutes AGW by 2 to 1 margin pretty much every year.
They cooked the numbers. Look at the data that Phil Jones didn’t want us to see! Don’t be afraid of numbers Steven, they won’t hurt you. Go and look for yourself. Old temps raised and new ones lowered.
AGW has become the laughing stock of all real scientists.
Should read :
“New temps raised and old temps lowered”
rather than
“Old temps raised and new ones lowered.”
Engineers don’t make mistakes they make revisions.
It was never a technical issue……..
That is an understatement!
It has always been an agenda looking for a cause.
In this case there are a multitude of agendas hooked to the same wagon!
Yes, that’s right, the 7-day US temp anomaly completely refutes long-term global warming. This will certainly cause me to rethink my position on AGW.
Well done.
Yes Chris,
After 50 years of unprecedented ocean warming and rise in greenhouse gases, ocean temperatures and atmospheric temperatures are below normal. It makes perfect sense to morons like you.
You bet. Everything you say is 100% true and relevant, and a 7-day regional anomaly disproves global warming, and I’m a moron. Absolutely.
Are there unicorns in your alternate universe?
Yes Chris, you are a moron. You believe that the massive heat capacity of the ocean allows it to quickly switch over to cold after 50 years of unprecedented heating.
It’s really difficult for me to stop laughing here, and I have work to do, so have a great day.
Yes, keep laughing. Because you have no clue about physics.
If Hansen were correct, it would be impossible to ever have a day below normal now. You are a genuine global warming moron.
Nice to see you back Chris. Your contributions are much more intelligent than the other warmists we have had over here for the last few weeks.
Hope you had a good Xmas.
Not that that is saying much though.
The alarmists tell blatant lies and then try to marginalize skeptics as being backward, ignorant and totally out of touch. That has been their obvious strategy and they have almost total backing from the media.
I just found this and it fits this thread:
http://omniclimate.wordpress.com/2011/01/06/addendum-to-skeptics-dictionary-hidden-persuaders-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/
A lot describes Chris very well. Basically it does a good job of describing the group this thread is reporting.
This is so typical on every issue that comes down the road. OK Media, roll out the RINO’s.
Yes and there appears to be a central group. MSM, government and scientists.
1/ Media needing drama for market share, just love the alarmist stuff
2/ Politicians with extremely strong involvement with the media and are more or less judged by it immediately on the news
and the loop is finally completed by
3/ scientists, who, like Skinner’s lab rats, are rewarded for pro AGW behaviour by government research grants,
which in turn make good media drama (back to 1/ again)
This is a closed loop system. It has behavioral elements and has a gain greater than one. It’s feedback instabilities will cause the system to “runaway” catastrophically.
(infinite regulations and costs)
An Evangelical that believes man controls the weather. Yepper, sure. I’m sure he’s somehow able to reconcile that.
That’s not what he believes.
“affecting climate” != “controlling weather”.
Chris, put it how you will, the thought that mankind can significantly affect our climate or weather is typically seen as inconsistent with the fundamental beliefs of “evangelicals”. I’m not saying one can’t be a believer in Christ and believe in CAGW, but, one would have to do some pretty heavy rationalizations to get there or interpret scripture in a non-typical manner.
Here, check this out as an example of beliefs based on scripture.
http://www.dianedew.com/weather.htm
Indeed a person that believes God’s Word has to trust Genesis 8:22 “While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.”
Yes. And then they bring out Kerry Emanuel who calls himself a conservative Republican……….. that voted for Obama.
I guess they can call themselves what ever they want to, but I hope they don’t confuse me for one of them.
ChrisD says:
January 7, 2011 at 3:13 pm
Chris, there is NOTHING to refute. State the null Hypothesis – then YOU have to refute it. As yet, it has not been even closely refuted. So Steve is not REFUTING anything. He is stating facts – those pesky things you appear to not know about.
Point. Missed. Completely.
The 7-day anomaly over a minute portion of the Earth’s surface says nothing whatsoever about long-term global climate trends. It’s a complete nonsequitur to include it in this post. The 7-day population statistics for chihuahuas in Tulsa would be just as relevant.
Goddard knows this, and I’m guessing that most of you guys do, too.
If the oceans had warmed as Hansen claimed, it would be impossible to ever have a day below the mean. Two thirds of the earth is ocean. Hansen also claimed that the Arctic has heated several degrees, which means that the source of cold air is gone.Stop being FOS.
The problem is that you are used to having your head buried in the sand.
Point. Missed. Completely
yes you did. YOU SAID
Yes, that’s right, the 7-day US temp anomaly completely refutes long-term global
So what does your latest statement have to do with your first erroneous one?
Again, Null hypothesis. Work from that and you cannot go wrong. So what was it again? Do you even know?