Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Total nonsense of course.
1. If a technology takes more energy and resources to produce than it generates we can hardly call it clean energy, can we?
2. Most of China’s “clean energy” is exported.
So how much is China spending on it’s just announced “clone F22”?
Or on it’s anti ship missile technology?
Or on it’s cyber war technology?
Or on it’s militarization of space?
Let’s compare apples with apples, shall we? Twice as much in clean energy? China’s population is 4 times that of America. Which means they are actually spending less on it per person. No catching up by America needs to be done. So let The Guardian tell China to catch up to America—if The Guardian dares to. I bet they don’t.
Also, I’d like to see the actual list of things called “clean energy” in China and what is called “clean energy” in America to see if those apples are apples too.
Awful lot of sucking up to China at the moment?
Guess we need to keep them sweet while the West inflates away its debt.
feh, we can easily get 100 billion by shutting down all federal grants and agencies pushing the bogus global warming meme, LOL.
Clean energy my ASS! All those supposed clean energy solar panels that were installed in Spain are coming apart, breaking down and becoming useless junk that the people are just removing and throwing away, it would cost to much to replace them, sorry forgot to mention that they happen to be just out of warranty, Read it on No Tricks Zone, Pierres blog, and by the way he has a bet going on with some warmist that tyhe next decade will be cooler than the last. Check it out it is for Charity for children. But back to the high QUALITY CHINESE solar panels, NOT!
But coal still burns really well….
It’s easy for China to look great, with them making a fortune by financing our debt.
Well thank goodness the military budget wasn’t cut while it was busy inventing the internet, else we wouldn’t be able to see these great suggestions from our friends at the guardian. Dolts.
China uses clean energy? Yep right after it uses up all the coal fired, gas fired, nuclear generated energy. Of course, all of this is possible because China refuses to let their Yuan float on the markets. More of that free, but not fair trade.