Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Francis Barnett on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Jack the Insider on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Trevor on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
Total nonsense of course.
1. If a technology takes more energy and resources to produce than it generates we can hardly call it clean energy, can we?
2. Most of China’s “clean energy” is exported.
So how much is China spending on it’s just announced “clone F22”?
Or on it’s anti ship missile technology?
Or on it’s cyber war technology?
Or on it’s militarization of space?
Let’s compare apples with apples, shall we? Twice as much in clean energy? China’s population is 4 times that of America. Which means they are actually spending less on it per person. No catching up by America needs to be done. So let The Guardian tell China to catch up to America—if The Guardian dares to. I bet they don’t.
Also, I’d like to see the actual list of things called “clean energy” in China and what is called “clean energy” in America to see if those apples are apples too.
Awful lot of sucking up to China at the moment?
Guess we need to keep them sweet while the West inflates away its debt.
feh, we can easily get 100 billion by shutting down all federal grants and agencies pushing the bogus global warming meme, LOL.
Clean energy my ASS! All those supposed clean energy solar panels that were installed in Spain are coming apart, breaking down and becoming useless junk that the people are just removing and throwing away, it would cost to much to replace them, sorry forgot to mention that they happen to be just out of warranty, Read it on No Tricks Zone, Pierres blog, and by the way he has a bet going on with some warmist that tyhe next decade will be cooler than the last. Check it out it is for Charity for children. But back to the high QUALITY CHINESE solar panels, NOT!
But coal still burns really well….
It’s easy for China to look great, with them making a fortune by financing our debt.
Well thank goodness the military budget wasn’t cut while it was busy inventing the internet, else we wouldn’t be able to see these great suggestions from our friends at the guardian. Dolts.
China uses clean energy? Yep right after it uses up all the coal fired, gas fired, nuclear generated energy. Of course, all of this is possible because China refuses to let their Yuan float on the markets. More of that free, but not fair trade.