Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Total nonsense of course.
1. If a technology takes more energy and resources to produce than it generates we can hardly call it clean energy, can we?
2. Most of China’s “clean energy” is exported.
So how much is China spending on it’s just announced “clone F22”?
Or on it’s anti ship missile technology?
Or on it’s cyber war technology?
Or on it’s militarization of space?
Let’s compare apples with apples, shall we? Twice as much in clean energy? China’s population is 4 times that of America. Which means they are actually spending less on it per person. No catching up by America needs to be done. So let The Guardian tell China to catch up to America—if The Guardian dares to. I bet they don’t.
Also, I’d like to see the actual list of things called “clean energy” in China and what is called “clean energy” in America to see if those apples are apples too.
Awful lot of sucking up to China at the moment?
Guess we need to keep them sweet while the West inflates away its debt.
feh, we can easily get 100 billion by shutting down all federal grants and agencies pushing the bogus global warming meme, LOL.
Clean energy my ASS! All those supposed clean energy solar panels that were installed in Spain are coming apart, breaking down and becoming useless junk that the people are just removing and throwing away, it would cost to much to replace them, sorry forgot to mention that they happen to be just out of warranty, Read it on No Tricks Zone, Pierres blog, and by the way he has a bet going on with some warmist that tyhe next decade will be cooler than the last. Check it out it is for Charity for children. But back to the high QUALITY CHINESE solar panels, NOT!
But coal still burns really well….
It’s easy for China to look great, with them making a fortune by financing our debt.
Well thank goodness the military budget wasn’t cut while it was busy inventing the internet, else we wouldn’t be able to see these great suggestions from our friends at the guardian. Dolts.
China uses clean energy? Yep right after it uses up all the coal fired, gas fired, nuclear generated energy. Of course, all of this is possible because China refuses to let their Yuan float on the markets. More of that free, but not fair trade.