I’m taking the bike on the train. The weather is perfect today!
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
Recent Comments
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Hey. Steve did you have any Cockles or Winkles there?
I tried those once in Wales – never again! Portugal is meat and potatoes. I fasted for four days this week, as I usually avoid eating when I travel.
Naa. They are the best of any sea food you can get, you can get them your self and boil them up, nothing like it you don’t buy them you go out and get them, that is the best!
But this is the wrong time of the season now isn’t it!
Sorry Steve, but how close to the Ocean are you, or do you get?
Because, if you are there, you can pick them and cook them your self. If you can get them that is. I really don’t know about it on that side of the Atlantic! I know you can’t get then on this side now! But with the new Warmcold it probably isn’t possible there too! HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Anyway, happy trails on your ride and be carefull, Eh!
What? Not buried in snow? 😉
I thought Frank Sintra was dead.
Enjoy the bike ride Steve, fantastic place to be, make the most of it.
Tried the port? Great drink.
Andy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntQY7CEj-i4&feature=player_embedded#
Enjoy the weather while you can, Steve.
A nice dose of warmcold awaits you when you get back to Denver….
http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=Denver,%20Colorado&wuSelect=WEATHER
It really is a beautiful city.
Have fun and enjoy the scenery.
How BBC warmists abuse the science
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8290469/How-BBC-warmists-abuse-the-science.html
Dr Benny Peiser and Dr David Whitehouse, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), have written to John Hirst, chief executive of the beleaguered Met Office, asking for an explanation of a press release issued by his organisation on January 20 and headed “2010 – a near record year”. This won headlines by claiming that last year was hotter than any other in the past decade.
When the two men examined the original data from which this claim was derived – compiled by the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit and the Met Office’s Hadley Centre – it clearly showed 2010 as having been cooler than 2005 (and 1998) and equal to 2003. It emerged that, for the purposes of the press release, the data had been significantly adjusted.
Comparing the actual data for each year, from 2001 to 2010, with that given in the press release shows that for four years the original figure has been adjusted downwards. Only for 2010 was the data revised upwards, by the largest adjustment of all, allowing the Met Office to claim that 2010 was the hottest year of the decade.
I asked the Met Office to comment on what seems like yet another embarrassing example of juggling with the figures. It denied the charge and I shall report on its lengthily evasive reply, once the GWPF has had a more considered response from Mr Hirst.
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=7123