Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
We Can’t Accurately Predict Or Explain Anything, But We Know It Is The Fault Of Humans
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
YEH !!
erm – was there sposeta be a link or pix here or something ? it got disappeared.
You know the story …
…. I do not.
Ignoramus et ignorabimus
The theory of humans sucks (HS) is a putative theory of theoretical physics that fully massage and links together all known physical phenomena, and predicts the outcome of anything that will ever happen is the fault of humans
..make that (TOHS)
It must be our fault.. because we emit CO2, even though it’s 0.03 of all CO2 emissions on Earth, and the Earth can determine that our CO2 is evil because humans are inherently evil, as opposed to natural CO2, which is not.. because, well.. natural stuff cannot think for itself.
You only THINK it’s 0.03 of all CO2 emissions. LOL
The truth is we don’t have a clue what total global CO2 emissions or flow are – these numbers are simply WAGs – and this I know cuz I went to grad school with and watched these people generate carbon model numbers. The numbers down at the purported probable human level of contribution are most certainly neither reliable nor accurate.
Whether it is the energy balance, CO2 balance, we seem to always begging with many quantities like x+- y. But then drop the ranges and just concentrate on x for our conclusions. If we deigned to carry the y along the final result would usually have such a wide range as to be meaningless. Dropping all the y’s makes us much surer than we could be.
not all humans.
just George Bush.
😉
Steve, you got it wrong.
Since we know that global warming is a fact, the null hypothesis is that all weather is due to global warming unless the deniers show otherwise. So, far from needing to predict or explain anything, global warming and the computer models that unequivically demonstrate that it is happening (just witness the record-breadking drought here in Australia that the Truth-sayers of global warming have been warning about) dramatically shows the truth.
Lady GaGa and Cher are human caused problems. Other than that, I don’t know.