World To Warm 2.4 Degrees In The Next Nine Years – We Will All Starve To Death

16 Responses to World To Warm 2.4 Degrees In The Next Nine Years – We Will All Starve To Death

1. R. de Haan says:

   January 19, 2011 at 4:28 am

   Complete baloney.

   The Herald Sun must have pimps and hookers for journalists.

   Reply
   • Bruce says:

     January 19, 2011 at 8:34 am

     Wash your mouth out with soap!

     On the other hand Andrew Bolt is certainly going to be very unhappy with his own newspaper.

     Reply
2. BioBob says:

   January 19, 2011 at 4:34 am

   shhhh – don’t confuse the proles…

   Reply
3. grayman says:

   January 19, 2011 at 4:37 am

   How can this be a good reportwhen it came from the IPCC 4th assment of 2007, which is just more garbage.

   Reply
   • BioBob says:

     January 19, 2011 at 4:46 am

     who said anything at all about GOOD ? At least we will only have to wait 9 years to demonstrate that the science was total trash or compellingly accurate.

     No rush. [giggles in the background as exiting]

     Reply
4. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

   January 19, 2011 at 5:09 am

   Starve to death, no, we’ll eat each other like Ted Turner said….no, I’m not kidding, he really said it:

   starting at 0:38 of this video

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mys_AQjM4U0

   Reply
   • suyts says:

     January 19, 2011 at 6:50 am

     Thanks Amino! I’d almost forgotten about that one! It needs to be shown every now and then.

     Reply
   • Mike Davis says:

     January 19, 2011 at 1:27 pm

     What would you expect from the guy that married Hanoi Jane!

     Reply
5. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

   January 19, 2011 at 5:11 am

   They said there would be food shortages back in the 1970’s coming ice age scare too.

   Reply
6. Slimething says:

   January 19, 2011 at 5:25 am

   This proves we should step up efforts to burn more food as fuel.

   Reply
   • Amino Acids in Meteorites says:

     January 19, 2011 at 6:44 am

     like this?

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeKBVOTnxIY

     Reply
7. Ordinary Debater says:

   January 19, 2011 at 5:59 am

   Deniers! A UN summit, due to Vancouver Sun 1982, explained that we within e few decades will be like extinct by a nuclear war climate change disaster. That’s within a year?! Science is settled by more UN summits, and politically founded researcher than ever! The scientific base increasing day by day…

   http://thegwpf.org/best-of-blogs/2246-flashback-1982-un-says-ecological-holocaust-by-2000.html

   Reply
8. Ordinary Debater says:

   January 19, 2011 at 6:09 am

   Well, the “nuclear holocaust”which UN talked about 1982 (should appear in a year now) was about something called pollution… (I wonder what pollution is? Is there any other bad things than CO2?) But a world government and planned economy, which they asked for then, wasn’t founded so now we’ll face nuclear death within 11 months…

   Reply
9. Sundance says:

   January 19, 2011 at 7:38 am

   Why in this comparison of CO2 to outgoing longwave radiation, is OLR increasing after 365ppm? I thought more CO2 was supposed to trap more OLR. Is this why oceans are cooling?

   http://www.climate4you.com/images/OLR%20versus%20CO2%20Equator.gif

   Reply
   • BioBob says:

     January 19, 2011 at 8:48 am

     erm, with that variance, you could draw a picture of a chicken in there and make it taste good, lol

     Reply
10. Jeff says:

    January 19, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    So the big, bad United States is in the select few (of course) but Canada, north of us, isn’t?

    Reply