That is why so many people from Florida and Hawaii vacation in Winnipeg. To escape the extreme weather of the South.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
What’s amazing is that they have convinced so many people that 2 degrees warmer is a bad thing….
….yet you ask people and they are all in favor of warmer
Perhaps convincing the other argument is much less credible. Enhance your knowledge of what 2 degrees global warming really means rather than this simplistic argument. What it doesn’t mean is that your place and all others will simply become 2 degrees warmer.
Are you saying that 2 degrees in higher temp produces universally bad outcomes?
He/she seems to be implying such. He/she also implies they have a certain degree of certitude regarding such an event. I’m interested in where he/she gained such knowledge. Baffled asks Lat to enhance his knowledge but doesn’t reference where he/she gained it?
Historically, mankind seems to thrive better in warmer climates. But Baffled seems to think this no longer holds true.
Of course, it wouldn’t be universally bad. Some places would be better off than others. Remarkably similar to conditions today and throughout the history of the world.
The whole idea of a 2 degree difference has really puzzled me for a long time. Where I live, we get traditionally get cold snaps of -50 in the winter and periods of 100+ in the summer… A whopping 150 degree difference in temperature between the seasons. A 2 degree movement either way isn’t going to be noticed, and could easily be completely lost in periods of “unseasonable” weather which may be slightly warmer or cooler than what is predicted in the Farmers Almanac.
Who’s with me?
I agree. We should start work on building a consensus.