Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
Dangerous To Snort Cocaine While Cycling In Heavy Traffic In A Polluted City
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/24/us-monsanto-roundup-idUSTRE71N4XN20110224
Roundup yummy yum
I was not aware people still relied on stories from Lancet. It is in the same league as the Onion after some of its “Better” studies were evaluated for accuracy a couple of years ago! It is also on par with Nature for followers with blind faith in the Chicken Little proclamations!
Why would anyone cycle in heavy traffic? Darwin fodder.
https://www.facebook.com/environmentguardian
Guardian has weird articles on Facebook time for debate?