Hansen was doing careful work, until his Manhattan office got inundated by sea level rise in 2008.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
Steig 09, and MBH98 are shining examples of careful work done by scientists./sarc.
I always hope that Susan continues posting at Dot Earth. Susan is a gold-standard CACA (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alarmist) and frequent poster at Dot Earth. She is particularly incensed by people who post ‘disinformation’ and ‘fake’ science that challenges the orthodoxy of CACC. She is also incensed when posters at Dot Earth spew ad hominem attacks against scientists, concerned citizens, bloggers and her famous father’s famous friend, Feynman. Apparently, non-reciprocity excludes self-incensement.
She has a remarkable world view that contributes measurable entertainment value to the formerly science blog, now opinion blog Dot Earth, as well as impacting the CACC movement in general.
Also real easy ascribing an opinion to someone who has been dead more than 20 years. Not as if he could complain.
lol, I was going to respond to her, but got busy at work…….yes, she seems like a fun one.
What is a “fake skeptic”? Is it a warmer denying their true devotions to the church? A backslider? 🙂
She has not talked to everyone that knew Richard Feynman. What she says about him is only what she is wishing to be true. She did not talk to Freeman Dyson about what he thinks Feynman would say.
I cannot believe Feynman would think the ClimateGate emails and computer code are good science.