Hansen was doing careful work, until his Manhattan office got inundated by sea level rise in 2008.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
Steig 09, and MBH98 are shining examples of careful work done by scientists./sarc.
I always hope that Susan continues posting at Dot Earth. Susan is a gold-standard CACA (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alarmist) and frequent poster at Dot Earth. She is particularly incensed by people who post ‘disinformation’ and ‘fake’ science that challenges the orthodoxy of CACC. She is also incensed when posters at Dot Earth spew ad hominem attacks against scientists, concerned citizens, bloggers and her famous father’s famous friend, Feynman. Apparently, non-reciprocity excludes self-incensement.
She has a remarkable world view that contributes measurable entertainment value to the formerly science blog, now opinion blog Dot Earth, as well as impacting the CACC movement in general.
Also real easy ascribing an opinion to someone who has been dead more than 20 years. Not as if he could complain.
lol, I was going to respond to her, but got busy at work…….yes, she seems like a fun one.
What is a “fake skeptic”? Is it a warmer denying their true devotions to the church? A backslider? đŸ™‚
She has not talked to everyone that knew Richard Feynman. What she says about him is only what she is wishing to be true. She did not talk to Freeman Dyson about what he thinks Feynman would say.
I cannot believe Feynman would think the ClimateGate emails and computer code are good science.