Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Ohio Cyclist on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
So who would be dumb enough to abandon their car and leave the door open in a blizzard?
Or maybe somebody checked it out for valuables after it was abandoned?
Anyhow, whoever owns it must be rather bummed out by the result.
Most likely a dumb ass liberal
Are you sure that isn’t file footage from the 1967 storm? Those look like old clunkers.
The fact that the 2011 storm could only produce 20 inches (in Chicago) where the 1967 storm made 25 inches is irrefutable evidence of global warming.
It’ll be fricking freezing for the Super Bowl, Mr. Bigglesworth.
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/45231/freezes-aim-for-lower-rio-gran.asp