http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110118_MilankovicPaper.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Steve,
You forgot the earlier part of the sentence in your headline”Implying the possibility of”.
Once again though you supply me with an interesting article. I certainly do learn a lot from this site!
In other words Steve forgot the scaremongering part.
Imply this, imply that, scare the people, make them feel guilty by implication and tax them to the hilt.
There we have AGW in a nutshell.
Next time don’t forget, OK Steve?
So you are saying that good settled science implies possibilities, coulds, ifs, maybes and such? LOL You guys destroy your own case every time you type a post.
”Implying the possibility of”.
Come, come Tony. They don’t imply, do they.
Tony Duncan,
There is no feeling of “possibilities” in what these global warming propagandists say. They are intent on scaring people. Get with it Tony. Drop the naiveté.
Man, you sure are working hard to get something across that just isn’t there in the real world.
Weird.. the paper doesn’t once make a consideration of current rate of sea-level rise. One would think that would be important since AGW is supposed to be affecting us right now, or at least serve as a comparator against what is supposedly going to happen.
How many times has a tipping point been predicted, which we’ve past since?
I just did a little study. I went on the NWS site for Columbus, OH. Only 7% of their 366 daily high temps have been set during the 10 years since 2000. Their records go back 140 years. That is almost exactly what it should be if there was no warming at all.
I didn’t cherry pick. I picked one station at random, a nice mid sized middle American city.
Hansen’s mind reached a tipping point a long time ago.
Baghdad Romm, Barney Fife of the left, protector of the sacred global warming propaganda.
I reach a “Tipping Point” Each day when I tip myself into bed! The globe reaches a tipping point twice a year with the two solstices. I am certain there are regional tipping that have been observed in the long term weather patterns throughout history. Anyone that has spent a fair amount of time on this planet has experienced more than one of those tipping points no matter what region you live in! Just like a see-saw the weather reaches a point and tips back towards the next trend!