Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
I remember the 70’s and 80’s winters very well..
…and do not wish to repeat that
1977 it snowed in Miami, and we lost all of our coconut trees…………
Where did this global warming rumor start? There appears to be very little happening in the real world to validate the claim.
It’s mostly in the Arctic, where there is mostly no data.
Science works that way. People think that all of a sudden climate change corrupted science, but it has been corrupt from the first day a scientist was rewarded with a result. Once the result is more important than the method science is lost. I wouldn’t be surprised if they eliminate the scientific method from science project requirements in schools soon. The new science is pick a result and find some way to make it work, without showing how you made it work, and declaring that settled and robust. It’s a shame and any ‘scientist’ dabbling in that no matter the grant money is a pox on their discipline.