The red dot is where GISS was at in January, even with their bogus temperature increase. February should be even lower. Slow is the new fast.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
Recent Comments
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on Diversity Is Our Strength
- GeologyJim on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Bill Odom on “a persistent concern”
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
We need a new dictionary…
warmcold
drywet
flooddrought
slowfast
any others??? 🙂
There’s Windcalm and hotblizzard……. polartropics
and of course the Risefall of the oceans.
Negative Global Warming is definitely going faster than the so called experts wanted it to happen. That is why they have been screaming about
Tipping” points for so long. They knew at any moment the climate would shift into the cooling pattern we are experiencing now.
For one joyous moment I thought Geoffrey Lean had left the Daily Telegraph and gone to The Independent, a more appropriate home for his left wing crackpot outpourings. And then I read the date…….
How about GoreSuzuki – last year Suzuki claimed that Vancouver was warm and wet due to AGW, and the next day Gore claimed that Wash. DC was snow bound and cold because of AGW.
Notice the article is about “Global Warming” being 3 times as fast, but nowhere do they mention temps?
Beats me how they come up with “seas are rising twice as rapidly” unless they’re working from a very underestimated prediction, or they just cherry picked a spot on the Earth instead of using global figures.
Which one is their worst prediction? Lots of them are just awfully wrong. It’s hard to know which to label the worst.